Welcome Guest

You confuse government protections of certain IP with

Posted on: December 23, 2020 at 09:54:38 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58158
Member For:
23.72 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the underlying IP - I think (again - you're just stupid.)

The government didn't create Coca Cola's formula (in fact the government doesn't protect that IP), McDonalds secret sauce, or Microsoft programming.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Hard to envision how bad it can/will get.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/23 09:01:17
          you a big streamer of pirated content? - ashtray UF - 12/23 09:07:59
               I only referred to his last comment.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/23 09:12:21
                    so you agree that this part of the bill - ashtray UF - 12/23 09:16:43
                         Not really.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/23 11:12:31
          LOL, you are stupid - tigerdb MU - 12/23 09:34:51
               oh dear (nm) - pickle MU - 12/23 09:39:18
                    You confuse government protections of certain IP with - tigerdb MU - 12/23 09:54:38
                         i’m not confusing anything here (nm) - pickle MU - 12/23 10:01:48
                              Then my point stands(nm) - tigerdb MU - 12/23 10:07:49
                                   it doesn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 12/23 10:15:01
                         trade secrets aren't the same as copyrights/patents - ashtray UF - 12/23 09:58:38
                              RE: trade secrets are IP. - tigerdb MU - 12/23 10:01:20
                                   the concept of IP is based purely in government - ashtray UF - 12/23 10:02:16
                                        Without the individual "Intellect", there is nothing to own. - tigerdb MU - 12/23 10:05:25
                                             you can't "own" thoughts (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/23 10:27:18
                                             value is a different topic altogether - pickle MU - 12/23 10:16:23
                                                  No - it's a claim of ownership of ones own work - - tigerdb MU - 12/23 10:24:37
                                                       if i sing a song or play it on piano - pickle MU - 12/23 10:36:41
                                   incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 12/23 10:02:05
          I disagree strongly with this - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/23 09:15:43
               you’re talking about value, which is not the subject - pickle MU - 12/23 09:39:05
                    Again I disagree - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/23 09:41:48
                         a tool is a physical object (nm) - pickle MU - 12/23 09:47:31
                              They don't manifest out of thin air pickle(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/23 10:01:08
                                   they are physical property and production - pickle MU - 12/23 10:03:01
                                        so an idea has to be brought to physical reality - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/23 10:08:35
                                             yes. information is not property - pickle MU - 12/23 10:17:31
                                                  so a novelist doesn't own his works? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/23 10:21:40
                                                       correct. he only owns the physical object - pickle MU - 12/23 10:23:01
               It's just another example of how stupid pickle is. - RHAYWORTH MU - 12/23 09:22:19
                    “Why spend the time, money to develop” - pickle MU - 12/23 09:40:17
          Only if its in the law. You pathetic clown.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/23 09:02:06
               lol what? (nm) - pickle MU - 12/23 09:03:18
     when do amazon, google, netflix, or hulu stream - ashtray UF - 12/23 08:50:04




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard