Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

if you bothered to read...

Posted on: December 13, 2020 at 18:44:17 CT
paleojas MU
Posts:
1264
Member For:
24.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
you'd see that when animal models are used to develop medical treatments, and only one sex is used, the results may not be generalizable. The NIH required studies to address both sex and gender (if human studies) for precisely this reason--it makes the science better.

But sure... go ahead and use this for whatever political purpose you need to. Just know that you're being disingenuous.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Trust the science - ummmm MU - 12/13 18:07:02
     Sex yes, but gender has no place in science as it is a - TigerMatt STL - 12/13 19:04:01
     Science is always trying to get better. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/13 18:39:26
          Unless politics gets in the way.(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 12/13 18:43:45
               No. Science always tries to get better, despite interference - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/13 18:45:37
          Not in this instance. This is a departure from objectivity - ummmm MU - 12/13 18:41:09
               Actually, the EU grant just requires that sex and gender - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/13 18:49:20
                    The control of the process is the problem. - ummmm MU - 12/13 18:54:02
                         Its just mainly rrquiring a disaggregation of data. Really, - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/13 18:56:04
                              Previously unwelcomed advisors aren't needed for that. - ummmm MU - 12/13 21:25:49
                              Exactly. This was mandated at NIH several years ago already - paleojas MU - 12/13 18:56:41
                                   If someone identifies as an asexual worm, it has absolutely - TigerMatt STL - 12/13 19:06:08
                                        It does if it is hormone related - paleojas MU - 12/13 19:12:33
                                             Do you know of any hormonal conditions specific only - TigerMatt STL - 12/13 19:38:46
                                                  Like exogenous estradiol in men transitioning to women? - paleojas MU - 12/13 23:08:26
                    What if the science suggest something that runs counter - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/13 18:52:02
               if you bothered to read... - paleojas MU - 12/13 18:44:17
                    Read all the way to the end. - ummmm MU - 12/13 18:45:18
                         I read to the end. What are you worked up about? - paleojas MU - 12/13 18:47:51
                              RE: I read to the end. What are you worked up about? - ummmm MU - 12/13 18:52:19
                                   Of course health and social scientist are more likely to - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/13 19:00:04
                                        Not correct. - paleojas MU - 12/13 19:00:40
                                             I know they do. But hard scientist are not pushing this. - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/13 19:04:53
                                                  Is the biggest difference between soft and hard science - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/13 19:08:36
                                   You're misreading this... - paleojas MU - 12/13 18:55:58
                                        Intersectional has undetstood meaning here - ummmm MU - 12/13 21:24:17
                                        Why would you assume a rat's gender?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 12/13 19:12:10
                                             I don't assume anything. I don't account for it. - paleojas MU - 12/13 19:13:53
     Progressives always follow science, assuming of course, that - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/13 18:29:43
          I agree. I'll stick to a book of - KCMuskie MU - 12/13 18:55:12




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard