 |
|
The long and short of it though
Posted on: December 6, 2020 at 11:28:34 CT
DC Jayhawk KU
Posts:
7832
Member For:
17.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
is that you won't accept or trust anyone's explanation unless it concludes there was fraud. You don't really want an investigation; you want your beliefs to be vindicated. If I tell you person A says there's no fraud, you'll provide another reason why they're not to be believed. Same with Person B, C, D and everyone else.
Your candidate lost. He lost Iowa in 2016 and said there was fraud. He lost NH and said there was fraud. In the 2016 general election, he said that if he lost, it would be because of fraud. He repeated it in 2020. All of these claims are unsubstantiated. All of them.
I can't make this any clearer that your candidate just fabricates claims and you've swallowed it whole. So it doesn't matter who investigates, when they do it, or where -- you won't believe a single. thing. they. say.
Your candidate lost. He lost Iowa in 2016 and said there was fraud. He lost NH and said there was fraud. In the 2016 general election, he said that if he lost, it would be because of fraud. He repeated it in 2020. All of these claims are unsubstantiated. All of them.
I can't make this any clearer that your candidate just fabricates claims and you've swallowed it whole. So it doesn't matter who investigates, when they do it, or where -- you won't believe a single. thing. they. say.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
The long and short of it though - DC Jayhawk KU - 12/6 11:28:34