Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

"Congress wouldn't abolish this Unconstitutional law, so why

Posted on: November 10, 2020 at 10:26:00 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
66569
Member For:
10.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
should I ?"

What a disgrace.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Ouch - Ace AU - 11/10 10:16:36
     if it or part of it is unconstitutional then it is SC job - fatrat MU - 11/10 10:33:25
          Notice The Idiot disagrees with you. That is of course - hokie VT - 11/10 10:39:45
               read the Constitution - pickle MU - 11/10 10:41:50
                    I am somewhat in agreement - Iam4Mizzou MU - 11/10 11:06:05
     "Congress wouldn't abolish this Unconstitutional law, so why - zounami MU - 11/10 10:26:00
          You poor thing...somebody won't - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/10 10:33:50
          because that is not SCOTUS’ role - pickle MU - 11/10 10:31:20
               it literally says that's the role(nm) - Iam4Mizzou MU - 11/10 10:37:05
                    M v M disagrees (nm) - pickle MU - 11/10 10:40:49
                         it's weird how you can take a simple concept - Iam4Mizzou MU - 11/10 10:41:51
                              read the plain text. it’s right there - pickle MU - 11/10 10:44:09
                                   just so I understand, your issue is that - Iam4Mizzou MU - 11/10 11:03:02
                                        yes, the issue is that the Constitution is a dead document - pickle MU - 11/10 11:08:49
                                   You are correct on this one. That hurt to type(nm) - tman MU - 11/10 10:45:28
                                        Wrong. If a partisan Congress passes an Unconstitutional - zounami MU - 11/10 10:58:13
                                             that is 100% incorrect - pickle MU - 11/10 11:00:03
     It's their job to strike down laws that are unconstitutional - zounami MU - 11/10 10:23:37
          no it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 11/10 10:30:26
               um, yes it is(nm) - Iam4Mizzou MU - 11/10 10:33:40
                    um, no it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 11/10 10:41:09
                    not when it goes against aspects of laws which are - Ace AU - 11/10 10:36:23
     That's pretty rich coming from Roberts - Sal MU - 11/10 10:23:06
          I'd be very cirucmspect of any information or quote posted - hokie VT - 11/10 10:28:56
     His job is to rule on Constitutionality, last I checked(nm) - Spanky KU - 11/10 10:21:18
          Exactly. How did this clown get nominated and confirmed?... - zounami MU - 11/10 10:24:59
     Even with lib Roberts on your side still 5-4. ACA is gone(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 11/10 10:19:38
          Don't be so sure. - DC Jayhawk KU - 11/10 10:33:51
          the stupid and uninformed flows so effortlessly with you - Ace AU - 11/10 10:25:17
               In the case of severability, the Obama care act - tman MU - 11/10 10:47:55
               “Obviously it was justified under the taxing clause, but now - Spanky KU - 11/10 10:32:02
               “Why couldn’t we believe when Congress zeroed out the tax - Spanky KU - 11/10 10:31:13
                    that is still a tax, Spanky. - Ace AU - 11/10 10:37:26
                         No.. a zero rate is not a tax(nm) - Spanky KU - 11/10 11:11:18
                              nope - Ace AU - 11/10 11:36:18
                                   Wrong.... a zero tax rate is not the same as taxes being - Spanky KU - 11/10 12:07:14
               Obamacare collapses without the mandate. (nm) - zounami MU - 11/10 10:26:52




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard