Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Tough call, should durham wait until after election to

Posted on: July 9, 2020 at 11:31:06 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67455
Member For:
9.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
release findings and indictments?

Do the people have the right to know what the government knows and make their own decisions about what is likely to happen?

Should they hold the findings to avoid the appearance of politicizing this?

For example, i agree that comey should have told us that fat hillary was under investigation and that she had done some things that were extremely sloppy. Or whatever the wording was.

Was it political to release that?
Would it have been political to NOT RELEASE it and let the voters think that nothing was happening?

And when comey announced that no charges would be brought, was that political?
Or would it have been political TO NOT RELEASE the findings and let voters think she would be indicted?

We are always in a political season. To release sensitive and damaging information about a pol or a candidate can be good information for voters to have.

Or it could be manufactured, politicized deep state, steele dossier crap.

The durham thing is taking FOR-EV-ER. That means that either there is a mountain of information to go through or that durham is dragging his feet.

Not sure what to wish for here.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-under-pressure-to-wrap-up-investigation-could-punt-to-after-election-day-source
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Tough call, should durham wait until after election to - hokie VT - 7/9 11:31:06
     RE: Tough call, should durham wait until after election to - MOCO SON MU - 7/9 12:10:21
     Be ridiculous to wait. It's not a tough call at all. Either - MUTGR MU - 7/9 12:08:55
          I think that's where i am. But not sure and for me it - hokie VT - 7/9 12:16:47
     I'm amazed there is seemingly no leaks about durham. - GA Tiger MU - 7/9 11:46:56
          That means that there is nothing good for the socialists - hokie VT - 7/9 11:51:03
               No news is no news. If Durham had something concrete - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 11:51:47
                    Lol at Sparkles(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/9 12:07:22
                         You're irrelevant nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 12:22:46
                              You are projecting again Sparkles(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/9 12:33:29
          The media wouldn't report them anyway - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 11:50:26
               The media is sensationalist. Of course they would - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 11:51:12
                    you really are just dumb as hell(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 11:52:45
                         Understated(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/9 12:08:25
                              Yes, the nickname Ragliar doesn't do his - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 12:25:15
                         I'm realistic. Look at how much free press Trump got in 2016 - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 11:56:39
                              Of course you're right, princess. Now, off you go. nm - hokie VT - 7/9 11:59:42
                                   I'm not interested. Go looking for dates elsewhere. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 12:23:25
                                        We know, sux johnsons and macfudgepacker are your boyz(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/9 12:34:56
                         He really is(nm) - Panthera MU - 7/9 11:55:58
     If national sec. not involved then NOTHING the gov't does - GA Tiger MU - 7/9 11:45:07
          National security is a lame arguments - meatiger MU - 7/9 12:08:58
          I agree. The legitimate concern is of course that adam snif - hokie VT - 7/9 11:49:40
               Probably writing the play script now.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 7/9 13:24:04
               That is why everything should be released - meatiger MU - 7/9 12:09:54
     bread and circus (nm) - pickle MU - 7/9 11:42:34




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard