Welcome Guest

Not endangers, only harms. And the harm has to be causally

Posted on: May 25, 2020 at 14:32:13 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44902

Member For:

13.46 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

proven, not just conjecture.

Otherwise, the gray area of this debate will enslave us all. An argument about "endangering" can be made for just about anything.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Anyone who truly thinks there is ONE person in the - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 13:39:10

Why in the world would you think there would be? - raskolnikov MU - 5/25 14:53:25

What if there is no plan that would work. If so, there - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 15:03:04

Ha ha ha ha. COME ON - you alter plans but you have one(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/25 15:10:19

so make your plan - ashtray UF - 5/25 15:12:22

B/c the plan is to encompass a nation response. Putz(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/25 18:28:50

my plan is probably different from yours, putz - ashtray UF - 5/25 20:01:00

is this one of those black and white things that are so bad? - pickle MU

- 5/25 14:01:02

You might call it one of those black and white things. Miine - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 14:29:12

i’m sure there are some shades of gray and nuance in there - pickle MU

- 5/25 14:37:56

No one thinks that unless they possess the fatal conceit. - ummmm MU - 5/25 13:43:42

What people do for and TO themselves should be - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 14:26:45

Not endangers, only harms. And the harm has to be causally - ummmm MU - 5/25 14:32:13

But a relevant and equivalent example can be - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 14:55:22

GAT - pickle MU

- 5/25 17:46:23

Gubmit creates a crisis and then convinces everyone - Newcatbirdseat MU - 5/25 15:05:04

Maybe. Let me know when you got an example.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 16:10:58

And the "harm" has to be related to an infringement - ummmm MU - 5/25 14:35:53

No it doesn't. It just MIGHT be related to - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 15:04:41

Just don't do anything except develop a vaccine. - Newcatbirdseat MU - 5/25 13:42:29