maybe they would have looked at closing businesses in a different manner...or maybe businesses would have had a way to refuse to close since they had no money otherwise.
When we do this, businesses will not change unless they are forced to...and there are only two ways to force businesses to change....leave them out on their own...or highly regulate them.....one could argue high regulation worked for the banks this time around as a result of the last crash....does this mean we now need a high regulation of other businesses?
I think no...I think the message needs to be sent...there will be emergencies in the future...so set your businesses up so you don't require a bailout....
Unfortunately, there are too many people on both sides like you that are fine with government to come in during an emergency and spend trillions.
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16882585
This directly contradicts what you said in the above post. Please...connect those dots.