Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

$70 is not unaffordable.

Posted on: March 15, 2020 at 20:14:18 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
And no, they did the opposite of "denying it to many people who needed it". They preserved its availability for those who really need it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

This comment from a petition to prosecute the TN brothers - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:02:14
     They weren't trying to help anyone. nm. - MUTGR MU - 3/15 20:51:37
          of course they were (nm) - pickle MU - 3/15 23:01:17
     No, they weren't. They were hoarding the product in order to - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:08:21
          lol no (nm) - pickle MU - 3/15 23:03:53
          Yes, they were trying to drive up demand - 615Tiger STL - 3/15 20:22:22
               so much ignorance - pickle MU - 3/15 23:15:10
               they didn't have any impact on demand. Try again. Demand - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:24:28
                    They decreased the supply - 615Tiger STL - 3/15 20:41:21
                         lmfao no - pickle MU - 3/15 23:02:13
                         they impacted supply, which didn't "drive up - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:50:01
          They were likely hoarding it - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/15 20:20:16
          Yes, to make a profit by getting hand sanitizer to those who - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:10:47
               It's ok to make a profit, but monopolies and other market - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:15:46
                    So just let people buy it all up in a panic and have no supp - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:25:45
               By hoarding and raising the price to being unaffordable,they - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:12:56
                    false. the stock would have been gone AND not available - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:17:25
                         How do I know the hoarders haven't cut the sanitizer - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:20:13
                              and, again, $70/bottle is better than UNAVAILABLE (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:22:10
                                   Especially if you have kids who really need it like the - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:45:53
                    $70 is not unaffordable. - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:14:18
                         $70 for something that costs $2 is unaffordable for many - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:17:42
                              The reason why it's gone is because stores kept the price at - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:47:24
                              It would have been unavailable at any price (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:18:36
                                   Yes. Create an artificial shortage and then rape the people - Tigrrrr! MU - 3/15 20:22:25
                                        he didn't create an artificial shortage. nature and the mar - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:23:46
                                             Put it in a memo and send it to the AG.... - Tigrrrr! MU - 3/15 20:26:38




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard