Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No, they weren't. They were hoarding the product in order to

Posted on: March 15, 2020 at 20:08:21 CT
SparkyStalcup MU
Posts:
25380
Member For:
13.69 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
get rich quick and in the process they potentially worsened a public health crisis.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

This comment from a petition to prosecute the TN brothers - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:02:14
     They weren't trying to help anyone. nm. - MUTGR MU - 3/15 20:51:37
          of course they were (nm) - pickle MU - 3/15 23:01:17
     No, they weren't. They were hoarding the product in order to - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:08:21
          lol no (nm) - pickle MU - 3/15 23:03:53
          Yes, they were trying to drive up demand - 615Tiger STL - 3/15 20:22:22
               so much ignorance - pickle MU - 3/15 23:15:10
               they didn't have any impact on demand. Try again. Demand - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:24:28
                    They decreased the supply - 615Tiger STL - 3/15 20:41:21
                         lmfao no - pickle MU - 3/15 23:02:13
                         they impacted supply, which didn't "drive up - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:50:01
          They were likely hoarding it - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/15 20:20:16
          Yes, to make a profit by getting hand sanitizer to those who - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:10:47
               It's ok to make a profit, but monopolies and other market - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:15:46
                    So just let people buy it all up in a panic and have no supp - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:25:45
               By hoarding and raising the price to being unaffordable,they - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:12:56
                    false. the stock would have been gone AND not available - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:17:25
                         How do I know the hoarders haven't cut the sanitizer - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:20:13
                              and, again, $70/bottle is better than UNAVAILABLE (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:22:10
                                   Especially if you have kids who really need it like the - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:45:53
                    $70 is not unaffordable. - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:14:18
                         $70 for something that costs $2 is unaffordable for many - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/15 20:17:42
                              The reason why it's gone is because stores kept the price at - ummmm MU - 3/15 20:47:24
                              It would have been unavailable at any price (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:18:36
                                   Yes. Create an artificial shortage and then rape the people - Tigrrrr! MU - 3/15 20:22:25
                                        he didn't create an artificial shortage. nature and the mar - 90Tiger STL - 3/15 20:23:46
                                             Put it in a memo and send it to the AG.... - Tigrrrr! MU - 3/15 20:26:38




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard