There's no cut in your article.
Posted on: February 27, 2020 at 14:07:20 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.46 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
There's a redistribution of money from one public health initiative to another one.
Also, your article is from early 2018 and has no bearing on what is going on today.
Lastly, the PPHF was not intended to address any form of disease containment, as per your article:
PHF is the “core of public health programs” in the U.S., Frieden says. It was established in 2010 and financed by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), with the goal of improving health outcomes and enhancing the quality of health care. Initially, the ACA authorized $500 million for the fund in 2010, which was to grow to $2 billion per year by 2015. The funding was to be mandatory, and therefore protected during yearly appropriations allocations.
Despite such protective measures, the PPHF has become a coffer to cover programs not directly related to public health initiatives supported by its mandate. For example, in February 2012, Congress passed and then-President Barack Obama approved legislation that cut the fund by $6.25 billion over nine years (fiscal years 2013-21) to provide money for a scheduled cut to Medicare physician payments. And in December 2016, the fund was cut again by $3.5 billion over seven years (fiscal years 2018-24) to pay for the 21st Century Cures Act.