Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I haven't(nm)

Posted on: January 30, 2020 at 17:49:49 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
126858
Member For:
22.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

dems stepped in it by stating again and again they had - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 16:29:04
     Trump for 8 Right on Baby !! Unstoppable(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 17:55:08
          That's right you commie fvcktard. MAGA - Emoji Man MSU - 1/30 18:38:27
          RE: Trump for 8 Right on Baby !! Unstoppable(nm) - scan MU - 1/30 17:59:08
               ha ha ha ha 75% of the country disagree with you(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 18:07:49
                    Its more like 85% because polls always over sample - Floyd Turbo 99 - 1/30 18:11:00
                    RE: ha ha ha ha 75% of the country disagree with you(nm) - scan MU - 1/30 18:09:51
                         I didn't say that - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 20:31:57
     They do. Justice will not be served at this "trial". - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 16:39:38
          Obstruction only happens when you ignore a court ordered - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 18:06:14
          They did not, and it's not even close. quit lying. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 17:50:21
          RE: They do. Justice will not be served at this "trial". - MOCO SON MU - 1/30 17:40:13
          RE: They do. Justice will not be served at this "trial". - MOCO SON MU - 1/30 17:23:26
          yer that stupid. wow(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 1/30 17:08:43
          You can't claim obstruction when the Executive Branch - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 16:46:51
               Executive privilege still hasn't been invoked. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 16:56:46
                    They haven't had to (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 17:07:24
                         McGhan(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 17:29:57
                              RE: McGhan(nm) - MOCO SON MU - 1/30 17:31:45
                                   Nope. Not for McGhan either. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 17:35:33
                                        RE: Nope. Not for McGhan either. - MOCO SON MU - 1/30 17:38:43
                                             Because he didn't show up and it was taken to court (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 17:41:43
                                                  RE: Because he didn't show up and it was taken to court (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 1/30 18:11:08
                    Because the House has not challenged it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 17:01:52
                         Why do you continue to ignore the case - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/30 17:21:03
                              I haven't(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 17:49:49
               The executive branch has not claimed any privilege. They - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 16:48:20
                    RE: The executive branch has not claimed any privilege. They - MOCO SON MU - 1/30 17:33:16
                    Read sloooooowwwwwweeeeerrrrrr. when - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/30 17:27:42
                    Not true - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 16:51:05
                    They haven't had to yet - Sal MU - 1/30 16:50:23
          Congress is not superior to the Executive Branch - Spanky KU - 1/30 16:46:01
               Power of the purse. - bornoncampus MU - 1/30 16:52:33
                    He didn't hold it back - Sal MU - 1/30 16:54:57
                         Only after he was caught once the whistle blower - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 17:45:50
                         Yep..as required by law. Trump complied with the law - Spanky KU - 1/30 16:58:20
                              Only after he was caught. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 17:46:33
                                   That is conjecture on your part - Spanky KU - 1/30 17:58:11
               Bingo - House wants their word to be the final aribitor - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 16:48:33
               The executive branch is not superior to Congress, and they - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 16:47:05
                    How's that going for you? Lol(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/30 17:28:10
                    And that is why neither can compel the other - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 16:52:00
                    That is why the courts decide (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 16:49:00
                         There was simply no time for that. Lol(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/30 17:28:55
                    Where is that 'constitutional role' in the Constitution? - Spanky KU - 1/30 16:48:56
          Link to any obstruction into investigating Trumps misdeeds? - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 16:45:11
          It's a political process - Sal MU - 1/30 16:44:39
               And the GOP will pay for it in November. 75% of Americans - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 16:46:10
                    So what. Most wanted dems to drop this a long time - tman MU - 1/30 17:00:53
                    And 90% of them wanted Crooked Dems to be interrogated. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 1/30 16:48:22
          Only by dems. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 1/30 16:43:39




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard