Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Which tweet, god dammit(nm)

Posted on: January 30, 2020 at 14:29:06 CT
MrBlueSky MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
20.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
They characterized my argument as if I had said that if a president believes that his re-election was in the national interest, he can do anything. I said nothing like that, as anyone who actually heard what I said can attest.

Those were literally his spoken words. He's trying to say they weren't
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

lol lil adam just had to admit it's ok to condition aid - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:57:40
     it is fine to condition aid if it benefits the United States - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:04:19
          If it benefits both at the same time - Sal MU - 1/30 14:48:37
          Hey Einstein. Biden investigation would benefit Americans. U - yy4u MU - 1/30 14:36:29
               if done by American investigators, sure (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:39:01
                    That would leave Democrats out then. Nm - yy4u MU - 1/30 14:40:13
                         If Don really wanted an investigation into corruption - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:41:26
               a legal one, would, fo sho (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/30 14:38:26
          What if it does both? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 14:13:47
               I understand what Alan said quite clearly. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:19:12
                    You clearly don't understand what he said (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 14:48:52
                    you're too stupid to explain this to so just answer the - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 14:33:30
                    which tweet? - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:20:40
                         you serious? He's changing his words completely - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:27:10
                              No he didn't (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 14:49:20
                              lol, I read the rest of today's tweets. - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:35:54
                              is it this one? - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:29:48
                                   His words are very clear, dan/tim(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:30:14
                                        Yes, they were (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 14:51:27
                                        yes they were. What was the magic latin term he was using - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:33:01
                                             again, the words are clear to understand - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:38:00
                                                  he never said it wasn't a quid pro quo, he talking about - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:45:48
                                                       This is going to break his brain (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 14:51:54
                              Which tweet, god dammit(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:27:47
                                   RE: Which tweet, god dammit(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:29:06
                                        He didn't say that (nm) - Sal MU - 1/30 14:49:34
                                             He literally did. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 15:07:01
                                        "he can do anything" - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:32:15
                    lol so not only do you not understand what he said - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 14:20:21
                         Of course he did. Just look at all his tweets today - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:26:42
                              he destroyed his credibility - ashtray UF - 1/30 14:37:37
                                   He destroyed his credibility as soon as he said that abuse - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:38:40
          Does it benefit the US to make sure a Presidential candidate - TigerMatt STL - 1/30 14:11:46
               it was official US policy but you know this (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 1/30 14:16:16
                    that's a strange policy, but ok(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:19:05
                         GOP Senators were ok with it - Hamdogg KC - 1/30 14:22:02
               sure, why didn't Don use his own DOJ then? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 14:13:12
                    should have used surveillance via the FISA process. - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:14:53
                         Frankly, I think leveraging the IRS is more effective(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:17:01
                              when did that occur? (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 1/30 14:17:19
                                   Many past administrations, including Obama's(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:17:56
                                        when, like what year? (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 1/30 14:18:42
                                             Approximately 2004-2013 there was a claim - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:21:40
                                                  who was in charge of the House back then? - Hamdogg KC - 1/30 14:22:47
                                                       RE: who was in charge of the House back then? - THEGROVE68 MU - 1/30 14:40:01
                                                       You're trying to build a windmill to tilt at - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:27:03
                                                            So there was an inquiry. what happened then? (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 1/30 14:29:12
                                                                 Here's one article about the settlements - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:35:26
                                                                 Some claims were debunked, others settled - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:30:49
                                                                      There was also a claim that McCain's office wanted to use - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:32:29
                                                                           And here's one on FDR using it against Huey Long - Mormad MU - 1/30 14:37:01
                                             don't be obtuse(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/30 14:19:23




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard