Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

That is an utter lie.

Posted on: January 29, 2020 at 10:57:59 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
What he stated - try reading the report - was that he did not find "enough material evidence" to form an indictment, due in large part to the time restrictions of the inquiry.

Had he found "no evidence" he would have stated that.

Your president stated on nearly countless occasions that there were NO CONTACTS b/t his camp and Russian and Mueller found approximately 125 such contacts.

And you say I am dishonest? You are pathetic.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Blumpf is right, it will never be enough for the dems - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/29 10:01:17
     Dems have become flyover territory. Nm - yy4u MU - 1/29 10:08:47
     It was and is the Impeachment of the Pres Don Trump - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:05:25
          Didnt you say the Russians stole the election from TheHag - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:09:30
               No, I never said that - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:43:41
                    Liar. Mueller said he found no evidence of any member - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:48:18
                         That is an utter lie. - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:57:59
                              Lol. So he found insufficient evidence? Goddam you are - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 11:01:15
               Over and over and over again - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:11:00
                    RE: Over and over and over again - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:44:32
                    He's a dishonest pos partisan hack (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:11:32
                         He's a silly little man - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:13:58
                              Why are you so emotionally driven re:some anonymous poster(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:45:40
                                   It is not an emotional assessment - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:48:26
                                        Exaclty what it is - please note something here - not once - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:53:37
     They may full well know some dems are going to see it as - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:03:46
          This. If this becomes the new standard for impeachment... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:07:52
               no, the new standard is - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:10:35
                    The new standard is this doesn't need to... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:20:36
                         thanks for your nonsensical opinion - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:21:57
                              You should know all about opinion because... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:23:56
                                   just like your heroes have against Biden - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:25:05
                                        So you’ve chosen to ignore the Transcript and now... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:32:02
                                             LOL, you're so fcking dumb it's comical - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:32:59
                                                  Libs and morons always post like, you. You don’t even - hokie VT - 1/29 10:51:32
                                                       he has no position except that he's retarded - ashtray UF - 1/29 12:39:11
                                                  Not dumb, more...a believer in Occam’s Razor. Tell me... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:42:57
                                                       LOL - ashtray UF - 1/29 12:39:58
     Pre-ordained? - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:03:10
          Then why wasn't he impeached for committing a crime - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/29 10:13:55
               Read below - it's funny - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:14:37
                    I can only read so much of Blue's stupidity each day - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/29 10:21:54
          Then why wasn't there an article of impeachment - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:04:36
               They did not, in part because of POTUS' obstruction (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:07:35
                    and in part because Democrats are incompetent (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:09:49
                    LOL - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:09:26
                         what would you call blocking congressional subpoenas - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:10:09
                              No they have not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:12:24
                                   Obama claimed executive privilege. Trump hasn't done that - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:12:52
                                        Had they pushed it that would have been the claim - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:14:58
                                             Trump has never invoked executive privilege - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:17:23
                                                  The House never went to that point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:18:49
                                                       Subpoenas issued....subpoenas ignored...articles of - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:21:48
                                                            In the courts where executive privilege would have been - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:26:51
                                                                 Executive privilege was not invoked by Trump - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:29:30
                                                                      Nobody said it was. The Dems waved the white flag before - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:31:50
                                                                           He truly does not get anything beyond some talking points he - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:32:41
                                                                                Not at all. I understand how the process works and it was - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:33:32
                                                                                     It worked as intended - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:34:20
                                                                      It didn't need to be - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:30:36
                                                                           they didn't give up, they drafted articles of impeachment - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:32:56
                                                                                Lol. And how is that going? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:35:34
                                                                                     if the Trump party hadn't taken over the GOP - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 11:02:59
                                                                                          If your aunt had balls she would be your uncle. Whaaaaa!(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 11:05:36
                                                                                               for someone who claims to despise Trump - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 11:07:54
                                                                                You asked why there was no Executive Privilege asserted - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:35:17
                                                            Rush to impeach instead of going to court to prove their - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:24:08
                                                                 Yep - but he has no clue - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:27:38
                                                  Nancy never had the house vote on giving the committees - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:18:39
                                                       He just keeps digging - and looking worse and worse - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:19:14
                                                            RE: He just keeps digging - and looking worse and worse - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:22:56
                                                                 Who said they can't? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:27:58
                                                                 Where does it say they have to? Elections have consequences. - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:25:21
                                                                      trials regularly have witnesses (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:25:58
                                                                           So? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:28:21
                                                                           Answer the question. Where does it say they have to?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:27:33
                                                                                The same place where it says they don't have to (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:30:00
                                                                                     So what are you menstruating about then?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:32:54
                                             He will now get emotional and call you names(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:16:23
                                                  All caps - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:17:19
                                                       Nah, that's rask(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:20:02
                                        Nancy never had the house vote on giving the committees - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:14:02
                              Why didnt the Dems take it to court to prove it didnt exist? - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:11:12
                                   Federal courts ruled on McGhan - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:12:13
                                        Didnt it get appealed?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:12:57
                                             it was appealed and a 2nd judge upheld the 1st judge's - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:18:13
                                                  Wasnt it appealed again and then the Dems gave up?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:19:24
                                                       yes, it was appealed again - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:20:12
                                                            So, the Dems could've dug in, passed the necessary - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:21:55
                                                                 yes, they could have (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:23:28
                                                                      But instead just wanted to hang impeachment on their - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:26:50
                                                                           I don't know, but that sounds like Democrats - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:28:42
               no, they didn't do their job - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:06:08
                    No, it doesn't - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:10:08
                         nobody said it is - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:11:33
                              Sure it does - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:13:34
                                   not at all - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:15:55
                                        They can fight the appearance of the witness - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:18:01
                                             but they can't stop the subpoena - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:18:22
                                                  And they may be able to compel testimony - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:20:02
                                                       I didn't say he was (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:20:55
                                                            You complained he blocked testimony - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:31:51
                                                                 you missed the point entirely - ashtray UF - 1/29 12:38:08




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard