Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
It didn't need to be
Posted on: January 29, 2020 at 10:30:36 CT
4TigersinMichigan
MU
Posts:
126863
Member For:
22.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
The House gave up before the Executive Branch had to.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
Blumpf is right, it will never be enough for the dems
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
1/29 10:01:17
Dems have become flyover territory. Nm
-
yy4u
MU
-
1/29 10:08:47
It was and is the Impeachment of the Pres Don Trump
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
1/29 10:05:25
Didnt you say the Russians stole the election from TheHag
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:09:30
No, I never said that
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
1/29 10:43:41
Liar. Mueller said he found no evidence of any member
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:48:18
That is an utter lie.
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
1/29 10:57:59
Lol. So he found insufficient evidence? Goddam you are
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 11:01:15
Over and over and over again
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:11:00
RE: Over and over and over again
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
1/29 10:44:32
He's a dishonest pos partisan hack (nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:11:32
He's a silly little man
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:13:58
Why are you so emotionally driven re:some anonymous poster(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
1/29 10:45:40
It is not an emotional assessment
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:48:26
Exaclty what it is - please note something here - not once
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
1/29 10:53:37
They may full well know some dems are going to see it as
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:03:46
This. If this becomes the new standard for impeachment...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
1/29 10:07:52
no, the new standard is
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:10:35
The new standard is this doesn't need to...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
1/29 10:20:36
thanks for your nonsensical opinion
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:21:57
You should know all about opinion because...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
1/29 10:23:56
just like your heroes have against Biden
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:25:05
So you’ve chosen to ignore the Transcript and now...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
1/29 10:32:02
LOL, you're so fcking dumb it's comical
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:32:59
Libs and morons always post like, you. You don’t even
-
hokie
VT
-
1/29 10:51:32
he has no position except that he's retarded
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 12:39:11
Not dumb, more...a believer in Occam’s Razor. Tell me...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
1/29 10:42:57
LOL
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 12:39:58
Pre-ordained?
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:03:10
Then why wasn't he impeached for committing a crime
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
1/29 10:13:55
Read below - it's funny
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:14:37
I can only read so much of Blue's stupidity each day
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
1/29 10:21:54
Then why wasn't there an article of impeachment
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:04:36
They did not, in part because of POTUS' obstruction (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:07:35
and in part because Democrats are incompetent (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:09:49
LOL
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:09:26
what would you call blocking congressional subpoenas
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:10:09
No they have not
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:12:24
Obama claimed executive privilege. Trump hasn't done that
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:12:52
Had they pushed it that would have been the claim
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:14:58
Trump has never invoked executive privilege
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:17:23
The House never went to that point
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:18:49
Subpoenas issued....subpoenas ignored...articles of
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:21:48
In the courts where executive privilege would have been
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:26:51
Executive privilege was not invoked by Trump
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:29:30
Nobody said it was. The Dems waved the white flag before
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:31:50
He truly does not get anything beyond some talking points he
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:32:41
Not at all. I understand how the process works and it was
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:33:32
It worked as intended
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:34:20
It didn't need to be
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:30:36
they didn't give up, they drafted articles of impeachment
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:32:56
Lol. And how is that going? (nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:35:34
if the Trump party hadn't taken over the GOP
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 11:02:59
If your aunt had balls she would be your uncle. Whaaaaa!(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 11:05:36
for someone who claims to despise Trump
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 11:07:54
You asked why there was no Executive Privilege asserted
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:35:17
Rush to impeach instead of going to court to prove their
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:24:08
Yep - but he has no clue
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:27:38
Nancy never had the house vote on giving the committees
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:18:39
He just keeps digging - and looking worse and worse
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:19:14
RE: He just keeps digging - and looking worse and worse
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:22:56
Who said they can't?
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:27:58
Where does it say they have to? Elections have consequences.
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:25:21
trials regularly have witnesses (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:25:58
So?
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:28:21
Answer the question. Where does it say they have to?(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:27:33
The same place where it says they don't have to (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:30:00
So what are you menstruating about then?(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:32:54
He will now get emotional and call you names(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:16:23
All caps
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:17:19
Nah, that's rask(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:20:02
Nancy never had the house vote on giving the committees
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:14:02
Why didnt the Dems take it to court to prove it didnt exist?
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:11:12
Federal courts ruled on McGhan
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:12:13
Didnt it get appealed?(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:12:57
it was appealed and a 2nd judge upheld the 1st judge's
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
1/29 10:18:13
Wasnt it appealed again and then the Dems gave up?(nm)
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:19:24
yes, it was appealed again
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:20:12
So, the Dems could've dug in, passed the necessary
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:21:55
yes, they could have (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:23:28
But instead just wanted to hang impeachment on their
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
1/29 10:26:50
I don't know, but that sounds like Democrats
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:28:42
no, they didn't do their job
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:06:08
No, it doesn't
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:10:08
nobody said it is
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:11:33
Sure it does
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:13:34
not at all
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:15:55
They can fight the appearance of the witness
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:18:01
but they can't stop the subpoena
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:18:22
And they may be able to compel testimony
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:20:02
I didn't say he was (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 10:20:55
You complained he blocked testimony
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
1/29 10:31:51
you missed the point entirely
-
ashtray
UF
-
1/29 12:38:08