Just depends on how schools want to approach it
Posted on: January 28, 2020 at 09:09:07 CT
FIJItiger
MU
Posts:
141776
Member For:
21.22 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
2
ku submits a perfect score of 1.000 nearly every single season since the metric has been created.
In 2015-16 we reported a single year score of 930 to the NCAA which coincidentally is exactly the minimum threshold required by the NCAA for a 4 year avg. But the odd thing about that single year score is that 930 is only mathmatically possible if you get 40 out of 43 possible points available. There are not other combinations unless you expand your roster out to something akin to the size of a football roster.
Except the denominator in the calculation has to be an even number, because every player for every semester has 2 available APR points. 930 is not really a viable score for a basketball program with 10-13 student athletes on the roster.
For Kim's final season we submitted a single year score of 955. Which coincidentally was the exact score needed to keep our 4 year avg above the 930 threshold and gave us a 4 year rolling score of 932.
As long as we keep doing that kind of stuff we are fine. What it really indicates moreso is that the 851 score that was retroactively blamed on Haith could have been easily avoided had we taken the same approach we have in each following year when there was significantly more turnover. But much like the retroactively created NCAA investigation, our administration had a vested interest in creating a narrative that Haith left behind a mess and pushed that narrative even to the detriment of MU as a program.
Edited by FIJItiger at 09:14:47 on 01/28/20