Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Back when fat Jerry said you had to have bi-partisan

Posted on: January 20, 2020 at 13:31:56 CT
Ragnar Danneskjold MU
Posts:
81634
Member For:
20.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
support for any impeachment or else it isn't legitimate.

or cryin chuck saying you don't need to have witnesses at an impeachment.

but of course you want to forget those bits of hypocrisy because you are a partisan hack pos.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

No crime needed for impeachment - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 13:26:33
     “There is no inconsistency between what I said during the - Spanky KU - 1/20 14:46:42
          He was also making the argument that no President - Sal MU - 1/20 14:48:17
     Glad you are devastated(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 1/20 14:13:23
     I don't think you have the argument correct - Sal MU - 1/20 14:07:12
     It's a terrible argument... - Gyro MU - 1/20 14:00:37
          Use of US resources for re-elect effort? Come on now(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 14:04:03
               this just in: asking an elected official to look into - blake1771 MU - 1/20 14:27:15
                    You're not too bright, I get that - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 14:35:54
                         you're not too bright...the OLC has already ruled NOT - blake1771 MU - 1/20 21:38:58
                         Who cleared the Bidens of wrongdoing? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/20 14:46:03
               prove it!!!(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 14:04:59
                    Mountains of evidence - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 14:06:55
                         you and gray beaver share the gift telling lies(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 1/20 14:23:23
                         If that was true, the House wouldn't want the Senate - Sal MU - 1/20 14:10:47
                              More evidence has become available and if one were honest - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 14:27:22
                                   why you worried abuot a fair trial now?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 15:19:20
                                   No evidence to prove the case you're - Sal MU - 1/20 14:46:39
                                   what evidence is that? an individual under indictment for - blake1771 MU - 1/20 14:29:13
                                        Bolton, McCabe, Parvas, now.(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 14:36:44
                                             that was all available then, they didn't ask them to testify - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 15:23:26
                                             Bolton won't provide anything his aid didn't testify to - Sal MU - 1/20 14:47:35
                         it's conjecture and innuendo, all shades of gray - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 14:10:37
     nothing wrong with that statement(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 13:57:19
     Back when fat Jerry said you had to have bi-partisan - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/20 13:31:56
     Because Clinton got a BJ from an intern in the Oval Office - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/20 13:28:52
          He lied about it - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 14:05:43
          except he was impeached for perjury(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 13:58:09
               Yes. But if he hadn't been such a horndog chasing poon - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/20 14:15:47
          RE: Because Clinton got a BJ from an intern in the Oval Office - MOCO SON MU - 1/20 13:54:12
               He is a member of the bar - JayHoaxH8r MU - 1/20 14:00:31




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard