Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Dershowitz: As usual, you misunderstand what AD is

Posted on: January 20, 2020 at 09:33:49 CT
BH O'bonga MU
Posts:
26706
Member For:
5.69 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
proposing. It isn't a surrender to the abuse of power article. Here is a comprehensive analysis, just out this morning:

No, Trump Defense Lawyer Alan Dershowitz Is Not Conceding Abuse Of Power
"Alan Dershowitz is not conceding that Trump abused power. He is arguing in the alternative, a technique with big risks, but potentially big rewards."

https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/20/no-trump-defense-lawyer-alan-dershowitz-is-not-conceding-abuse-of-power/
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

All of you GOP a**holes okay with the Dershowitz... - Gyro MU - 1/20 09:09:17
     Oh, and fvck you coc_sucker - tigerfans3 MU - 1/20 10:35:01
     He didn't abuse anything but the democrats - tigerfans3 MU - 1/20 10:31:56
     Derpowitz got OJ & Epstein off...he can probably get trump - tigerdb MU - 1/20 09:56:20
     Never happened . . . might have happened . . . so what if it - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 09:52:29
          KNOCK. KNOCK...... - Emoji Man MSU - 1/20 09:57:30
               That amuses you in some way ??(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/20 10:02:26
     RE: Dershowitz: As usual, you misunderstand what AD is - BH O'bonga MU - 1/20 09:33:49
     Do you have a lot of experience defending sham - MUTGR MU - 1/20 09:31:09
          Liberal stomp the feet time - Reagan STL - 1/20 09:33:16
     Go hug a tree. - Reagan STL - 1/20 09:30:17
     calm down, bud(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/20 09:22:06
     Most presidents have done something that the opposite party - MU-TULSA MU - 1/20 09:19:41
          Which is a good argument and why Dems are stupid - ashtray UF - 1/20 09:21:54
               Narrator voice: In fact they did not have a clear case of - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/20 09:22:40
                    It 100% is - ashtray UF - 1/20 09:45:06
                         Couple of questions - Reagan STL - 1/20 09:52:39
                              if it was 100% bribery they would have included that in the - blake1771 MU - 1/20 10:02:13
                                   I don't base anything on what the Ds may or may not do - ashtray UF - 1/20 10:20:01
                              1) There were no federal statutes when the founders - ashtray UF - 1/20 09:56:07
                                   I asked if Trump violated a current fed. law - Reagan STL - 1/20 10:01:37
                                        No. Trump committed the crime of bribery - ashtray UF - 1/20 10:17:45
                                             Ash - I get that you want him out of office - but just be - Reagan STL - 1/20 10:28:28
                                                  Yes. I answered that - ashtray UF - 1/20 10:44:40
                                                       Really? then you ought to be able to provide the evidence - Reagan STL - 1/20 11:01:22
                                                            Whose discussions? The founders? - ashtray UF - 1/20 11:07:02
                                                                 Apparently you haven't read them since you cannot provide - Reagan STL - 1/20 11:09:25
                                                                      I don't care enough to build a case for impeachment - ashtray UF - 1/20 11:26:29
     Change yer pad. The lying MSN has you in fits - TigerFan92 MU - 1/20 09:18:27
     It is a tested defense that prevailed in a prior impeachment - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/20 09:14:19
          Happy MLK Day, Rags (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/20 09:16:26
     You seem angry - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/20 09:12:36
     until a dem does it - Iam4Mizzou MU - 1/20 09:12:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard