Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No

Posted on: January 16, 2020 at 10:02:11 CT
eatatjoes MU
Posts:
3371
Member For:
20.81 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
His post was centered on the idea that it's the GAO's "opinion" and therefore is meaningless. That is yet to be debated and determined. It was a solid rebuttal, and it's ok to acknowledge as much. We won't pull your trump card for it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Here is the full GAO opinion - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 09:38:46
     Supreme Court rulings are also opinions - ummmm MU - 1/16 09:43:25
          with legal authority and binding - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 10:01:24
               They're as binding as lower courts and subsequent - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:10:24
                    No, they are not legally binding in any way - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:16:09
                         I didn't say anything about legal standing. - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:19:41
                              It means they carry any weight from the standpoint of - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:21:49
                                   Oh okay, well weight is a different thing than standing. - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:51:54
                                   lol here’s a good read for you - pickle MU - 1/16 10:28:56
                    The opinions carry no binding weight or authority whatsoever - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 10:14:53
                         I agree. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:19:01
          But they have legal standing - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 09:55:34
               No - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 10:02:11
                    No actually 4Tigs is exactly right - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 10:03:03
                         If that was your entire point - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 10:45:52
                              No one said it wouldn't have impact - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:47:39
                                   Define "legal standing" - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 11:09:55
                                        No - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 13:11:11
                         The Doors were right - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:03:45
               and still an opinion, nonetheless - ashtray UF - 1/16 10:00:20
                    Legally, they are not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:03:28
                         More meaningful than Amateur Attorneys such as yourself - Ace A - 1/16 10:06:48
          😂 - Ace A - 1/16 09:53:53
               don't pretend you're on ummmmm's side. you're an - dangertim MU - 1/16 10:34:23
          Indeed(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 09:44:58
     RE: Here is the full GAO opinion: I read it and wondered - BH O'bonga MU - 1/16 09:42:30




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard