Welcome Guest

Per your linked article, this is option 2

Posted on: January 14, 2020 at 16:13:15 CT

Spanky KU

Posts:

146574

Member For:

21.03 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Non-photo identification permitted under the law before the Voter ID law took effect, along with an affidavit the person with the ID is the same one voting

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Missouri Supreme Court upholds lower court ruling re: Voter - MrBlueSky MU - 1/14 15:19:24

What are the pooooooorrrr brownish folk gonna do when - jonesin - 1/14 15:47:31

RE: What are the pooooooorrrr brownish folk gonna do when - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/14 15:55:52

russia interference bad! Voter ID's Bad! wait, what? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/14 15:46:14

States can decide whomever they want to vote in their - MrBlueSky MU - 1/14 15:52:38

RE Not Federal elections they can't. That's Horseshyte - jonesin - 1/14 15:54:43

I said states can decide whomever they want to vote in THEIR - MrBlueSky MU - 1/14 15:55:19

Boom - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/14 15:50:42

^^^^Gdamn right^^^^ - jonesin - 1/14 15:49:11

Seems like a moot decision since Option 2 expired in 2017 - Spanky KU - 1/14 15:31:01

It's still a part of the law...it took affect in 2017 (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/14 15:38:08

Per your linked article, this is option 2 - Spanky KU - 1/14 16:13:15

^^^^^^ never mind^^^^^^^ - Spanky KU - 1/14 17:00:36

Becuz orange man bad(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 1/14 15:36:46