 |
|
Missouri Supreme Court upholds lower court ruling re: Voter
Posted on: January 14, 2020 at 15:19:24 CT
MrBlueSky MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
20.54 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ID law. Portion of law is unconstitutional.
https://www.komu.com/news/state-supreme-court-upholds-ruling-on-missouri-voter-id-law
"In its ruling Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld Callahan's ruling, saying the affidavit requirement is unconstitutional and the circuit court didn't act improperly in barring the state from disseminating materials indicating photo ID is needed to vote.
"While the state has a legitimate interest in combating voter fraud by verifying a voter’s identity and eligibility to vote, requiring an individual to sign a misleading, contradictory affidavit to vote under option two is not a reasonable means to accomplish that goal," the opinion said."
https://www.komu.com/news/state-supreme-court-upholds-ruling-on-missouri-voter-id-law
"In its ruling Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld Callahan's ruling, saying the affidavit requirement is unconstitutional and the circuit court didn't act improperly in barring the state from disseminating materials indicating photo ID is needed to vote.
"While the state has a legitimate interest in combating voter fraud by verifying a voter’s identity and eligibility to vote, requiring an individual to sign a misleading, contradictory affidavit to vote under option two is not a reasonable means to accomplish that goal," the opinion said."
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Missouri Supreme Court upholds lower court ruling re: Voter - MrBlueSky MU - 1/14 15:19:24