 |
|
My original Q to ummm was whether he meant what he said,
Posted on: January 9, 2020 at 14:47:56 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68298
Member For:
9.70 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
that each resident of the united states is free to choose those laws with which he agrees and ignore any prohibition on actions disallowed by law or the constitution.
Ummm had stated earlier in the day that yes, that is what he meant. I reposted it a while ago.
Matt then said, incongruously, that people break the laws all the time.
That was not the question but once matt offered, it was repeated by The Idiot, meat and the rest of the club.
The original protagonist in the discussion ummm is not here. So matt has decided to humiliate himself by offering ridiculous responses to an easy question.
The question again, SHOULD people be permitted to pick and choose which laws they will obey based on their opinion of the constitutionality of the law.
Ummm had stated earlier in the day that yes, that is what he meant. I reposted it a while ago.
Matt then said, incongruously, that people break the laws all the time.
That was not the question but once matt offered, it was repeated by The Idiot, meat and the rest of the club.
The original protagonist in the discussion ummm is not here. So matt has decided to humiliate himself by offering ridiculous responses to an easy question.
The question again, SHOULD people be permitted to pick and choose which laws they will obey based on their opinion of the constitutionality of the law.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
My original Q to ummm was whether he meant what he said, - hokie VT - 1/9 14:47:56
-