Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
Should the executive branch have a check on it?(nm)
Posted on: December 11, 2019 at 07:43:15 CT
playhard
KC
Posts:
96045
Member For:
14.33 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
(nm) means no message
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
Let me get this straight: A Congress with a 9% approval rate
-
JeffB
MU
-
12/10 22:45:39
A Congress with a 9% approval rate is trying to remove
-
SparkyStalcup
MU
-
12/11 00:14:21
he did?(nm)
-
tigerNkc
MU
-
12/11 07:56:48
You do realize that obstruction of congress
-
Sal
MU
-
12/11 07:10:24
Should the executive branch have a check on it?(nm)
-
playhard
NWMSU
-
12/11 07:43:15
A check on what?
-
Sal
MU
-
12/11 07:45:05
The courts? You mean all those liberal activists judges?(nm)
-
playhard
NWMSU
-
12/11 07:52:00
What does that have to do with your original post? (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/11 07:57:35
rask already said he wants the black stain of impeachment
-
Calca
STL
-
12/10 23:06:11
RE: Let me get this straight: What's worse, the House can't
-
BH O'bonga
MU
-
12/10 22:50:47
Abuse of power and obstruction are high crimes, and have
-
SparkyStalcup
MU
-
12/11 00:17:08
RE: Abuse of power and obstruction are high crimes: Not
-
BH O'bonga
MU
-
12/11 07:52:15
I think they did it on purpose so they don’t have to prove
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
12/10 23:14:18
RE: I think they did it on purpose so they don’t have to prove
-
BH O'bonga
MU
-
12/11 08:08:47
Their voters don't require facts or evidence they just feel
-
MUTGR
MU
-
12/10 22:49:59