I’m sure the omissions were because they lacked enough

Posted on: December 10, 2019 at 07:47:47 CT

space to include those details.

Here’s what we are supposed to believe: the FIB bungled, fumbled and stumbled along for years with this. They are honest, dedicated, impartial, unbiased, hard working career public servants.

They omitted certain things. They embellished others. They forged still more. Ooops.

But they didn’t mean to. There was no bias. They are just the Keystone cops. They tried hard, they worked tirelessly for our great country.

They still get a trophy, right?

I had predicted that the report would be like Comey’s report on fat Hillary Clinton. They were just incompetent, stupid, incapable, morons. Clumsy, and poorly trained.

But they didn’t do it on purpose, so it’s OK.

In fat Hillary’s case, they said she had no intent so it’s OK. No crime was committed because you can’t have a crime without intent, right?
In this case, there was no bias. So it’s OK because you can’t have a crime without bias, right?

And if you are stupid enough to believe that fat hillary had no intent and the FIB had no bias, you are just the kind of voter the socialists need to fundamentally transform our country.

Edited by hokie at 07:49:32 on 12/10/19