 |
|
No he wasn't, you were inferring things not implied because
Posted on: December 7, 2019 at 11:09:09 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
152708
Member For:
22.63 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
14
you race to a response without consideration.
He was explaining why they reacted, not justifying it.
if you spit on a bully, it will prompt a beating and the act of spitting is most assuredly an act of aggression which elicits the response.
It doesn't "justify" the magnitude of the response, it explains it.
Don't be this stubborn, this thick-headed, and this old all at the same time.
He was explaining why they reacted, not justifying it.
if you spit on a bully, it will prompt a beating and the act of spitting is most assuredly an act of aggression which elicits the response.
It doesn't "justify" the magnitude of the response, it explains it.
Don't be this stubborn, this thick-headed, and this old all at the same time.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
No he wasn't, you were inferring things not implied because - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:09:09