Welcome Guest

context fails you again

Posted on: December 7, 2019 at 11:06:50 CT

Spanky KU

Posts:

141362

Member For:

20.25 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

pickle was clearly arguing that Japan was justified in attacking PH in retaliation for US ‘economic warfare’ against Japan

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

for anyone still confused - if I state that Person A - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 10:57:22

what does "act of war mean" then? - Ferg STL - 12/7 11:16:12

it's an act of aggression/force against another nation. - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:25:21

it implies that a war like response is justified - Ferg STL - 12/7 11:27:48

to you, perhaps, certainly not to me. So you think if - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:30:23

Don't slap a guy with a gun. Nm - hokie VT - 12/7 11:09:14

Can't argue with that(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/7 11:26:02

Lol - jonesin - 12/7 11:12:04

context fails you again - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:06:50

No i wasn’t. I have never said they were justified (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:14:04

You may have not used that exact word, but your constant - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:16:45

lmfao, is this when you tell pickle what he "really - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:25:59

I'm catching up. What posts will I find that theme in?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 12/7 11:22:43

Here is where pickle attempted to show Japan had a good - Spanky KU - 12/7 12:58:34

Wrong again (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:17:19

Nope - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:20:13

No he wasn't, you were inferring things not implied because - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:09:09

Factual statements confuse our beaker friend(nm) - miz_zou MU - 12/7 11:18:01

nope. I eagerly await pickle stating without qualification - Spanky KU - 12/7 12:44:10

nope.... it has been his constant refrain...that the US got - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:10:55

no, those are the words YOUR BRAIN utters repeatedly - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:26:58

I’ve never said justified nor have i said the US deserved it - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:15:04

You are very self unaware. - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:17:36

Or you’re a ****ing idiot - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:21:26

Try again..... - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:24:23

why, that's an entirely different statement and now you use - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:31:37

Use justify then - Spanky KU - 12/7 11:58:10

perfect response to - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 11:13:06

RE: for anyone still confused - if I state that Person A - jonesin - 12/7 11:06:01

Thanks for clarifying(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/7 11:03:55

yet you’ll keep doing it (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:05:07

Nope wrong again - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/7 11:07:06

i’m only going by your actions and posts (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:07:53

yup (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:05:31

that's the exact analogy I was thinking about - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 11:03:26

how about if someone stole was embezzling from me - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:05:18

Well, of course, that would be justified by many. - jonesin - 12/7 11:09:08

it wouldn't "justify" murder in any manner. It would explai - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 11:09:57

I forgot to clarify my response as sarcastic. nm - jonesin - 12/7 11:11:06

Weird - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 11:08:59