Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
They have an idea (nm)
Posted on: November 13, 2019 at 13:40:53 CT
Sal
CMSU
Posts:
224431
Member For:
20.82 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
Still waiting on that first hand evidence
-
mizzouSECedes
STL
-
11/13 13:24:49
I don't think the Dems considered how this would play
-
None****
MU
-
11/13 13:39:36
its going very well. Except in Fox world (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:57:44
A 2nd term Trump is a real scare for ya, huh? (nm)
-
MUGuy2004
STL
-
11/13 14:07:45
RE: its going very well. Except in Fox world (nm)
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 14:06:26
maybe because the admin keeps ignoring subpoenas
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:29:49
That darned executive privilege thing(nm)
-
MUGuy2004
STL
-
11/13 13:56:49
That darned impeachment thing (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:57:24
That darned Mueller investigation(nm)
-
MUGuy2004
STL
-
11/13 14:05:11
keep living in the past (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 14:39:43
RE: maybe because the admin keeps ignoring subpoenas
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 13:32:25
so then stop *****ing about not having first hand
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:43:10
There have been people who testified
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:45:58
why won't they allow Rudy, Bolton and Mulvany to testify? (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:57:02
The same reason you wouldn't want your lawyer
-
MUGuy2004
STL
-
11/13 14:06:29
They are all lawyers? (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 14:40:11
who is "they"? (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 14:05:14
it doesn't exist (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:26:05
Are you sure?
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 13:31:16
RE: Are you sure?
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 13:33:11
The people most probable to have 1st hand refuse apperance
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 13:37:26
RE: The people most probable to have 1st hand refuse apperance
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 13:39:11
Fact not fable. Mulvaney, Perry, Eisenberg, Ellis & Blair
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 13:47:39
RE: Fact not fable. Mulvaney, Perry, Eisenberg, Ellis & Blair
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 14:14:57
If nothing is wrong why not testify? Seems easy way
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 14:26:28
RE: If nothing is wrong why not testify? Seems easy way
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 14:29:09
They have (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:31:52
There are at least five who have not and reams of records
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 13:35:45
Yet Schiff wanted to push ahead with impeachment
-
mizzouSECedes
STL
-
11/13 13:37:24
Over his skis again just like the Russian narrative (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:38:35
Jesus Sal. Did you hit your head? (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:44:04
If you don't think Schiff is chronically lying
-
mizzouSECedes
STL
-
11/13 13:52:18
Schiff is making unsubstantiated claims again
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:45:09
lol (nm)
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
11/13 13:56:08
I'm going to guess "executive privilege"
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:37:03
That would be question specific, not a blanket reason to
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 13:40:30
They have an idea (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 13:40:53
They did not claim executive privilege-just didn’t show.
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
11/13 13:59:23
no it shouldn't
-
Sal
MU
-
11/13 14:04:33
RE: no it shouldn't
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 14:20:01
RE: it doesn't exist (nm)
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
11/13 13:28:38