Welcome Guest

I'm going to guess "executive privilege"

Posted on: November 13, 2019 at 13:37:03 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

223806

Member For:

20.77 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

"national security" and all of that other B.S. everybody throws out in order not to be transparent to the public

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Still waiting on that first hand evidence - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/13 13:24:49

I don't think the Dems considered how this would play - None**** MU - 11/13 13:39:36

its going very well. Except in Fox world (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:57:44

A 2nd term Trump is a real scare for ya, huh? (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 11/13 14:07:45

RE: its going very well. Except in Fox world (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 14:06:26

maybe because the admin keeps ignoring subpoenas - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:29:49

That darned executive privilege thing(nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 11/13 13:56:49

That darned impeachment thing (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:57:24

That darned Mueller investigation(nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 11/13 14:05:11

keep living in the past (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 14:39:43

RE: maybe because the admin keeps ignoring subpoenas - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 13:32:25

so then stop *****ing about not having first hand - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:43:10

There have been people who testified - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:45:58

why won't they allow Rudy, Bolton and Mulvany to testify? (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:57:02

The same reason you wouldn't want your lawyer - MUGuy2004 STL - 11/13 14:06:29

They are all lawyers? (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 14:40:11

who is "they"? (nm) - Sal MU

- 11/13 14:05:14

it doesn't exist (nm) - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:26:05

Are you sure? - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 13:31:16

RE: Are you sure? - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 13:33:11

The people most probable to have 1st hand refuse apperance - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 13:37:26

RE: The people most probable to have 1st hand refuse apperance - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 13:39:11

Fact not fable. Mulvaney, Perry, Eisenberg, Ellis & Blair - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 13:47:39

RE: Fact not fable. Mulvaney, Perry, Eisenberg, Ellis & Blair - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 14:14:57

If nothing is wrong why not testify? Seems easy way - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 14:26:28

RE: If nothing is wrong why not testify? Seems easy way - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 14:29:09

They have (nm) - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:31:52

There are at least five who have not and reams of records - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 13:35:45

Yet Schiff wanted to push ahead with impeachment - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/13 13:37:24

Over his skis again just like the Russian narrative (nm) - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:38:35

Jesus Sal. Did you hit your head? (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:44:04

If you don't think Schiff is chronically lying - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/13 13:52:18

Schiff is making unsubstantiated claims again - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:45:09

lol (nm) - Hamdogg KC - 11/13 13:56:08

I'm going to guess "executive privilege" - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:37:03

That would be question specific, not a blanket reason to - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 13:40:30

They have an idea (nm) - Sal MU

- 11/13 13:40:53

They did not claim executive privilege-just didn’t show. - Mo Texan MU - 11/13 13:59:23

no it shouldn't - Sal MU

- 11/13 14:04:33

RE: no it shouldn't - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 14:20:01

RE: it doesn't exist (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 11/13 13:28:38