Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It would drain the swamp and move offices closer to their

Posted on: October 24, 2019 at 12:15:18 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51161
Member For:
16.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
clientele.

Why is the Bureau of Land Management located in DC?

NASA?

Department of Agriculture?

Customs and Border Protection?

NOAA?

Fish and Wildlife?

Wouldn't all of those agencies function more efficiently if they were HQ'ed in locations closer to the programs that they serve?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Hawley with another gem - El-ahrairah BAMA - 10/24 11:45:18
     he ought to read Hazlitt (nm) - pickle MU - 10/24 12:32:10
     I didn't read the article to learn about expected costs... - Gyro MU - 10/24 12:13:46
          it’s Keynesian. it’s an awful idea - pickle MU - 10/24 12:33:34
               You lack a sense of reality... - Gyro MU - 10/24 14:31:05
     RE: Hawley with another gem - MUTGR MU - 10/24 11:57:44
     No logical rebuttal to his plan - Spanky KU - 10/24 11:47:17
          Austrian economics (nm) - pickle MU - 10/24 12:34:01
          Like a true Keynesian(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 10/24 11:52:08
               Why are all the agencies HQ'd in DC? - Spanky KU - 10/24 12:01:31
                    It would drain the swamp and move offices closer to their - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/24 12:15:18
                    All agencies are not HQ'd in DC - Ace AU - 10/24 12:13:50
                         Which are not HQ'ed in the DC area?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/24 12:17:36
                              the DOE is dispersed. - DC Jayhawk KU - 10/24 12:22:23
                    Don’t know - El-ahrairah BAMA - 10/24 12:11:16
          Eliminate both those agencies. - Newcatbirdseat MU - 10/24 11:51:52
               I don't disagree, but that ain't happening anytime - Spanky KU - 10/24 12:03:19




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard