Welcome Guest

There is no defense in a hearing. It is a hearing

Posted on: October 22, 2019 at 13:06:39 CT

raskolnikov MU

Posts:

187641

Member For:

24.65 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

The defense - if there is one - will get all relevant docs prior to the Impeachment Trial of Donald J Trump. That has a nice ring to it. As for reading docs under supervision - that's just horse****.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Sounds like a fair way to handle - mu7176grad MU - 10/22 13:03:23

RE: Sounds like a fair way to handle - MOCO SON MU - 10/22 13:56:03

Thank Nunes for being a leaky MFer - Ace AU - 10/22 13:17:19

RE: Thank Nunes for being a leaky MFer - MOCO SON MU - 10/22 13:57:10

Only thing enjoying more leaks than you is a urinal. - RHAYWORTH MU - 10/22 13:19:30

lol this is the democrats investigation - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:18:20

R v D whining - pickle MU

- 10/22 13:12:44

lol that means its worse than I thought for the dems - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:08:40

RE: lol that means its worse than I thought for the dems - raskolnikov MU - 10/22 13:10:45

This dog and pony show is a laughing matter. nm. - MUTGR MU - 10/22 13:12:23

I know you are incredibly slow but if they had the - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:12:17

That's certainly one possibility - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:17:43

There is no defense in a hearing. It is a hearing - raskolnikov MU - 10/22 13:06:39

So only dems should get transcript of hearings - mu7176grad MU - 10/22 13:11:03

^^^Doesn’t know Impeachment Rules!^^^ - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/22 13:29:33

Do they beat you publicly with one of those fat bats?(nm) - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:30:35

No one is talking about a defense moron lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:09:45

Isn't there a minority member representing every committee? - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:13:32

No. In many cases they have been barred from the room(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 13:19:55

What he posted has nothing to do with a "defense" - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:07:23

There are actually several reasons - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:11:48

I wasn't specifically talking about Trump - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:12:44

No, it would be equally true of any investigation - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:14:43

That's a pretty silly comparison - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:16:32

Well, now it sounds like you're talking about Trump - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:19:33

I'm specifically talking about the "impeachment inquiry" - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:21:46

Well, I'd assume at this point, it's just an inquiry - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:23:30

In 2015, the GOP controlled House changed rules - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 13:11:22

By the way I am consistent in my position - tman MU - 10/22 13:25:53

That references who can issue subpoenas - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:15:13

The GOP should file suit then, if the Dems are violating - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 13:18:53

why? that would be dumb. obviously there isn't much there - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:19:55

cool (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 13:21:01

So you don't specifically know what rights were taken away - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:22:21

What "rights" were limited? (nm) - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:11:44

RE: What "rights" were limited? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 13:14:02

Should've just said "I don't know" - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 13:17:19

I'm not reading through that entire document right now - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:17:17

Double Secret status has been implemented - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/22 13:09:59

It isn't a trial - raskolnikov MU - 10/22 13:09:19

I didn't say it was a trial - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:09:49

that grand jury though (nm) - Sal MU

- 10/22 13:05:28