Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I get it that you don't get it

Posted on: October 14, 2019 at 21:26:34 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It is a purposely HARD PROCESS. DIFFICULT. The Dems are not using it to remove him from office. The man in office has to do some bad sht - significantly bad sht for it to be pursued. THIS guy used approved military funding as a cudgel to beat the Ukraine into serving him politically. That's a crime. A BIG CRIME. It flies in the face of our Democratic Republic. So now the Dems will show the people the egregiousness of the act and then the GOP controlled Senate will be Sworn in as jurors. Chief Justice will hear the case. The Senate must them vote.

DUDE - It is a POLITICAL PROCESS. FACT. You drag partisanship into it and then claim "politicking".
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Hannity just told me the Transcript does not in any way - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:10:49
     How many people have made statements under oath? - JayRoy KC - 10/15 05:49:39
     Muellertime.......................... - TGR84 MU - 10/14 21:28:03
     No rational person can read that transcript and say there - MUTGR MU - 10/14 20:33:21
     And you are the feeblest mind going - mu7176grad MU - 10/14 20:24:18
     RE: Hannity just told me the Transcript does not in any way - patriot MU - 10/14 20:20:23
          There is a reason Nancy hasn't held a vote - Sal MU - 10/14 20:21:04
               You are so far in the dark, it is funny - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:26:32
                    Is it a true impeachment in your mind or purely - tman MU - 10/14 20:29:17
                         Dipweed. Impeachment IS a political act - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:33:34
                              Actually it isnt. But the way libs are conducting it that - tman MU - 10/14 20:51:20
                                   It is 100% political - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:57:59
                                        No it isnt. If it was it would have been used to remove - tman MU - 10/14 21:04:50
                                             I get it that you don't get it - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 21:26:34
                                                  No he didn't and the house will never vote on it - tman MU - 10/14 21:42:46
                    I'm not personally winning or losing anything (nm) - Sal MU - 10/14 20:28:17
     If Hannity was around during Watergate he would have - MrTruman2U MU - 10/14 20:16:15
     Wow. The majority part can impeach for anything - tman MU - 10/14 20:13:42
     There isn't any high crime or misdemeanor in it - Sal MU - 10/14 20:12:25
          You don't know what you are talking about Sal(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:27:48
               What law was broken according to the transcript? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/14 20:29:06
                    RE: What law was broken according to the transcript? (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:34:07
                         You think the conversation was a campaign violation - tman MU - 10/14 21:07:24
                              Obviously. I am done. Not a debate that it was criminal - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 21:29:24
          OK Sal. You can buy that line all day - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 20:14:35
               solicitation of ... what? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/14 20:15:05
                    This will be interesting(nm) - tman MU - 10/14 20:19:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard