Welcome Guest

Show me the rule change please

Posted on: October 14, 2019 at 13:34:25 CT

tman MU

Posts:

36268

Member For:

21.72 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

I looked. Now if you want to say it was never required in the past, even though they held the vote, that would be different

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Nancy held that vote yet? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/14 13:16:50

Doesn't need to hold a vote though I did hear a suggestion - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 13:26:24

She will be forced into a vote when Trump pushes - Spanky KU - 10/14 13:40:29

100% of predecessors had 100% of House Rules necessaiting - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 13:52:06

You think... but as usual, you don't have a clue if you - Spanky KU - 10/14 13:59:49

Y'all are losing on this one, you get that, right?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 14:07:04

If by y'all, you mean Nancy... - Spanky KU - 10/14 14:12:56

RE: Y'all are losing on this one, you get that, right?(nm) - scan MU - 10/14 14:07:47

lol "Don will never see the inside of the White House" - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/14 13:56:02

Mueller time.............................. - TGR84 MU - 10/14 14:02:23

RE: 100% of predecessors had 100% of House Rules necessaiting - scan MU - 10/14 13:53:26

RE: 100% of predecessors had 100% of House Rules necessaiting - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 13:57:36

Expansion of subpoena power in committees doesnt - tman MU - 10/14 14:18:34

You can keep barking up this tree all you want - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 14:30:47

Learn history. It has always been done the way I desribe - tman MU - 10/14 14:36:30

You are wrong - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 14:48:05

Nope. Look up the protocol rules that were set - tman MU - 10/14 14:57:17

He checked his gmail inbox - TIGERROAR MU - 10/14 15:41:06

Show me the rule change please - tman MU - 10/14 13:34:25

RE: Show me the rule change please - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 13:56:02

The rules didn't change. Read the article(nm) - tman MU - 10/14 14:06:07

RE: The rules didn't change. Read the article(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 14:07:45

Not for impeachment? The rules changed on who had authority - tman MU - 10/14 14:12:15

And the GOP the party that would not allow a supreme nom - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 14:32:57

Not taking action on a SC nominee had occurred in the past - tman MU - 10/14 14:55:54

Not for more than a year pal. - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 15:31:57

But it wasn't for over a year. Why exasperate the facts - tman MU - 10/14 15:35:24

Pelosi is one of greatest pols in history son - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/14 13:43:12

She is a devious old kunt. nm - jonesin - 10/14 13:46:27

Even fake teets, botox queen Nancy knows it's going - jonesin - 10/14 13:32:14

lol you are such a dopey hack(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/14 13:31:10

AOC won't let her hold a vote - mu7176grad MU - 10/14 13:30:25

It is Trump's ass on the line not AOC's - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 13:59:51

The House will make up everything they can - mu7176grad MU - 10/14 14:05:45

The House moves on the mystical path, gathering - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/14 14:14:27

They have him by the balls - raskolnikov MU - 10/14 14:10:16

RE: They have him by the balls - scan MU - 10/14 14:10:53

Did the muscle head Austrian Nazi get that retarded little - jonesin - 10/14 13:33:57

lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/14 13:44:10

What? I do. I worry about that little helmet wearer. I mean - jonesin - 10/14 13:49:19

ACE will support somethingTrump does first - mu7176grad MU - 10/14 13:22:20

You talk as if Trump is capable if accomplishing anything - Ace AU - 10/14 13:32:21

He's got all you subversive Bolshevik pr icks in a tizzy. - jonesin - 10/14 13:36:52

Gotta love old ACE. He's a smart cat. nm - jonesin - 10/14 13:23:54

She knows it will NOT go through a senate trial, and reddish - jonesin - 10/14 13:21:21