Welcome Guest

RE: I didn't say the rules regarding WB's were changed

Posted on: October 1, 2019 at 18:49:49 CT

None**** MU

Posts:

4919

Member For:

7.14 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

The rules and regulations to the IC's WB law weren't changed. The ICIG changed the protocols for accepting complaints after he had received the complaint. This is a sketchy deal, to say the least.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

So Australia proactively reached out to - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:00:42

So will this be like a couple of days ago when you all - playhard NWMSU - 10/1 18:15:20

RE: So will this be like a couple of days ago when you all - None**** MU - 10/1 18:48:34

This is the first I heard about this - Sal CMSU - 10/1 19:08:42

I didn't say the rules regarding WB's were changed - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:17:34

RE: I didn't say the rules regarding WB's were changed - None**** MU - 10/1 18:49:49

lol....Sal(nm) - playhard NWMSU - 10/1 18:22:14

show the link where he did that(nm) - dangertim MU

- 10/1 19:41:46

You realize those are two different things, right? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:28:35

ooooooooooooo a nameless Trump sycophant "source" - JG A - 10/1 18:09:22

RE: ooooooooooooo a nameless Trump sycophant "source" - None**** MU - 10/1 18:51:05

DON’T BASH MUH NEW YORK TIMES!!!!! - MIZ45 MU - 10/1 18:14:40

who was the NYT's source? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:11:16

Of the obvious obstruction? - JG A - 10/1 18:14:53

There are no "word for word" transcripts - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:16:15

Last thing NYT got right was VN post TET - mu7176grad MU - 10/1 18:03:29

Faux lawyer moves from sarcasim to hyperbole. - TexJohnson MU - 10/1 18:09:32