Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I didn't say the rules regarding WB's were changed

Posted on: October 1, 2019 at 18:17:34 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.85 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I said the language defining what met the requirements for an urgent complaint were. Nobody suggested the WB protections were somehow changed.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So Australia proactively reached out to - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:00:42
     So will this be like a couple of days ago when you all - playhard NWMSU - 10/1 18:15:20
          RE: So will this be like a couple of days ago when you all - None**** MU - 10/1 18:48:34
               This is the first I heard about this - Sal CMSU - 10/1 19:08:42
          I didn't say the rules regarding WB's were changed - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:17:34
               RE: I didn't say the rules regarding WB's were changed - None**** MU - 10/1 18:49:49
               lol....Sal(nm) - playhard NWMSU - 10/1 18:22:14
                    show the link where he did that(nm) - dangertim MU - 10/1 19:41:46
                    You realize those are two different things, right? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:28:35
     ooooooooooooo a nameless Trump sycophant "source" - JG A - 10/1 18:09:22
          RE: ooooooooooooo a nameless Trump sycophant "source" - None**** MU - 10/1 18:51:05
          DON’T BASH MUH NEW YORK TIMES!!!!! - MIZ45 MU - 10/1 18:14:40
          who was the NYT's source? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:11:16
               Of the obvious obstruction? - JG A - 10/1 18:14:53
                    There are no "word for word" transcripts - Sal CMSU - 10/1 18:16:15
     Last thing NYT got right was VN post TET - mu7176grad MU - 10/1 18:03:29
          Faux lawyer moves from sarcasim to hyperbole. - TexJohnson MU - 10/1 18:09:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard