Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Non-precedential

Posted on: September 30, 2019 at 10:08:47 CT
Ace UNC
Posts:
28917
Member For:
6.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
25
And unrelated to the case you cited
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Speech and Debate Clause shields Congress from libel - Ace AU - 9/30 09:35:01
     nope... See US v Brewster - Spanky KU - 9/30 09:46:22
          your case citation is fir a criminal matter - bribery - Ace AU - 9/30 09:54:49
               the ruling cites the limitations on the clause - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:01:01
                    Non-precedential - Ace AU - 9/30 10:08:47
                         Wrong yet again...... it cited PRECENDENTS in - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:14:02
                              You should read the 1808 case - Ace AU - 9/30 10:16:37
                                   You should try to understand English and stop - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:25:07
                                        Quit being an amateur attorney - Ace AU - 9/30 10:33:01
                                             Try again. Your contention that the Speech and Debate - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:36:16
     So lying about what someone said is protected because - tcat KC - 9/30 09:38:15
     It does not protect them from libel, I just protects them - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/30 09:37:41




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard