Welcome Guest

the ruling cites the limitations on the clause

Posted on: September 30, 2019 at 10:01:01 CT

Spanky KU

Posts:

146290

Member For:

20.99 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

“Careful examination of the decided cases reveals that the Court has regarded the protection as reaching only those things "generally done in a session of the House by one of its members in relation to the business before it,"

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

The Speech and Debate Clause shields Congress from libel - Ace AU - 9/30 09:35:01

nope... See US v Brewster - Spanky KU - 9/30 09:46:22

your case citation is fir a criminal matter - bribery - Ace AU - 9/30 09:54:49

the ruling cites the limitations on the clause - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:01:01

Non-precedential - Ace AU - 9/30 10:08:47

Wrong yet again...... it cited PRECENDENTS in - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:14:02

You should read the 1808 case - Ace AU - 9/30 10:16:37

You should try to understand English and stop - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:25:07

Quit being an amateur attorney - Ace AU - 9/30 10:33:01

Try again. Your contention that the Speech and Debate - Spanky KU - 9/30 10:36:16

So lying about what someone said is protected because - tcat KC - 9/30 09:38:15

It does not protect them from libel, I just protects them - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/30 09:37:41