Welcome Guest

RE: this thread isn’t asking about impeachment

Posted on: July 24, 2019 at 16:20:48 CT
MUTGR MU
Posts:
68498
Member For:
24.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I'm not. A sitting President can be removed by impeachment, so safeguards are in place. It makes sense to me that they not be subject to criminal indictment given the potential for political chicanery, which today of all days should be patently obvious.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Can you imagine all of the dirty US attorneys wanting - MUTGR MU - 7/24 15:17:03
          It is hard to imagine a Presidency with out criminal acts - JG A - 7/24 15:40:55
          ok. so? (nm) - pickle MU - 7/24 15:18:19
               He can be impeached. Makes sense not to indict - MUTGR MU - 7/24 16:05:35
                    that doesn’t make sense to me - pickle MU - 7/24 16:13:31
                         RE: that doesn’t make sense to me - MUTGR MU - 7/24 16:16:24
                              this thread isn’t asking about impeachment - pickle MU - 7/24 16:18:09
                                   RE: this thread isn’t asking about impeachment - MUTGR MU - 7/24 16:20:48
                                        RE: this thread isn’t asking about impeachment - pickle MU - 7/24 16:26:34
          Yes, I can imagine that. - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:17:53
               Sure. how's the no government thingy going? nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/24 16:06:08
                    ummmm isn’t an anarchist (nm) - pickle MU - 7/24 16:26:58
               Sounds like a problem with attorneys.The Bard had it correct - Emoji Man MSU - 7/24 15:35:36
          Yes, I think it's well established in this thread that other - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:21:21
               No one has said the President is above the law(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/24 15:49:39
          all animals are equal. - pickle MU - 7/24 15:20:04
     The idea being a criminal proceeding would be too - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/24 15:14:33
          Wait, who prosecutes following impeachment? (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:20:10
               me(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/24 15:21:03
                    Seriously, who? (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:23:39
                         DOJ - DC Jayhawk KU - 7/24 15:26:50
                         Amanda Billyrock - FootballRefugee MU - 7/24 15:26:47
                              lol now THAT's a blast from the past - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/24 15:35:57
                                   That would be a hand-picked gherkin(nm) - Mormad MU - 7/24 15:36:32
          After seeing the depths that the Dems sunk to during the - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/24 15:18:22
               Yes, I can imagine that. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:19:02
                    if people paused and thought - pickle MU - 7/24 15:21:11
          you’re making his point (nm) - pickle MU - 7/24 15:17:17
               He didn't have a point - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/24 15:20:42
                    The almighty office. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:23:03
                         No just the executive office(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/24 15:24:33
                              Hail to the chief, huh. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/24 15:26:33
                         it’s a non-answer - pickle MU - 7/24 15:24:31
          "But only when a republican is in office" Ragliar - JG A - 7/24 15:15:34
     it’s amazing that people defend gvmt (nm) - pickle MU - 7/24 15:13:15
     Right. Checks and balances are in place. It is Congress' - Emmanuel Goldstein MU - 7/24 15:11:46
          In theory, it protects the Office of the President - Mormad MU - 7/24 15:15:00




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard