Welcome Guest

Big difference, Nixon DID fire people and he DID hinder the

Posted on: July 24, 2019 at 10:46:34 CT

DHighlander NWMSU

Posts:

51161

Member For:

16.89 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

investigation.

You prove my point. The President does have the power to easily obstruct an investigation. The man in charge has testified multiple times that his investigation was NOT hindered.

The President either obstructs or he does not. He cannot TRY to obstruct.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I know you do not need an underlying crime to obstruct - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/24 10:27:39

I would guess that an attempted criminal act is - Spanky KU - 7/24 10:37:31

Here is the problem with that. How can the President ATTEMPT - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/24 10:43:34

i don't disagree...but there is a law that criminalizes - Spanky KU - 7/24 10:59:15

That is my point. When you have the ultimate power there is - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/24 11:04:16

RE: I know you do not need an underlying crime to obstruct - Ace AU - 7/24 10:32:04

Big difference, Nixon DID fire people and he DID hinder the - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/24 10:46:34

For a crime coverup. Care to try another example - tman MU - 7/24 10:42:00