Welcome Guest

It's not inconsequential, but it's a different discussion

Posted on: July 8, 2019 at 14:34:44 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56793
Member For:
18.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the discussion at hand is how much do we need to continue to outspend the opponents by.

Then, once you decide that number, the question becomes one of how much should each member contribute to that total?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Nato members are required to spend 2%. Only 5 out of 28 do. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/8 14:24:27
          Hey Rhayworthless ...if Albania and Croatia and Estonia et a - JG A - 7/8 15:40:37
               Anyone else hear a gibberring monkey? - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/8 16:39:08
          LOL even for you - JG A - 7/8 14:26:41
               It's not inconsequential, but it's a different discussion - Mormad MU - 7/8 14:34:44
                    The real discussion should be what is the - GA Tiger MU - 7/8 14:52:29
     Not a bad point. But then I'm a cheap sumbltch.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 7/8 14:01:23
     And, we've done that for 3 decades - Mormad MU - 7/8 13:52:07
          Over that time US and allies have outspent the "bad guys" - JG A - 7/8 13:59:51




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard