 |
|
1) highlights a common myth spread about accuracy of
Posted on: June 17, 2019 at 10:25:39 CT
TigerMatt MISS
Posts:
85723
Member For:
25.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
13
scribes as an example.
2) Yes I meant Mark not Luke. KJV omits Isaiah from the text.
3) 1 John 5:7-8 is rendered that way in the KJV because Erasmus gave in to pressure by the Catholic church. He had originally left it out, but because that was a key scripture to support trinitarianism, they pressured him to add it back in.
4) The text is still included in the Bible even though it is not found in any early manuscripts. Again this is used to highlight copying issues and modification of the Bible through the centuries.
2) Yes I meant Mark not Luke. KJV omits Isaiah from the text.
3) 1 John 5:7-8 is rendered that way in the KJV because Erasmus gave in to pressure by the Catholic church. He had originally left it out, but because that was a key scripture to support trinitarianism, they pressured him to add it back in.
4) The text is still included in the Bible even though it is not found in any early manuscripts. Again this is used to highlight copying issues and modification of the Bible through the centuries.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
1) highlights a common myth spread about accuracy of - TigerMatt STL - 6/17 10:25:39