Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: A sham ?? Sorry, that's definition of an overstatement

Posted on: June 11, 2019 at 09:29:06 CT
scan MU
Posts:
26518
Member For:
21.85 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Doesn't address what I said. Business as usual for the Tigerboard parrot.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Rask...do you really think the Mueller report wasn't a sham? - Logan BAMA - 6/10 22:05:53
     There is a good deal of re-iffication in there - raskolnikov MU - 6/11 08:38:16
          Rask, what is the main point of the Steele dossier? Would - blake1771 KC - 6/11 08:44:35
               There were contacts, something in the vicinity of 187 contax - raskolnikov MU - 6/11 08:52:25
     RE: Rask...do you really think the Mueller report wasn't a sham? - scan MU - 6/10 22:10:38
          A sham ?? Sorry, that's definition of an overstatement - raskolnikov MU - 6/11 08:53:30
               RE: A sham ?? Sorry, that's definition of an overstatement - scan MU - 6/11 09:29:06
          Sounds like someone else we know - tcat KC - 6/10 23:09:58




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard