Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Could not indict - now - BUT post-presidential indictment

Posted on: May 29, 2019 at 17:30:42 CT
scan MU
Posts:
26518
Member For:
21.86 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Why do you think anyone would care if he was indicted after he was out of office?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

$30 Mil and the deep state jackass could not make a decision - DoltfromSTL MU - 5/29 17:08:57
     They clearly made a decision. Cover up - JG A - 5/29 18:02:47
     Could not indict - now - BUT post-presidential indictment - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 17:28:45
          Bring it on! Put up or shuttup! Stop being a chicken****... - DoltfromSTL MU - 5/29 17:55:48
          How wise of you. If only this info could’ve come to light - Emoji Man MSU - 5/29 17:50:04
               That's why they have the hearings, expose the boy(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 18:11:31
                    Let "The Inquisition" Begin! - DoltfromSTL MU - 5/29 18:30:58
          RE: Could not indict - now - BUT post-presidential indictment - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:36:30
          As you said earlier only the big guy commits crimes in a - Floyd Turbo 99 - 5/29 17:33:38
          RE: Could not indict - now - BUT post-presidential indictment - scan MU - 5/29 17:30:42
          He could still recommend prosecution - Sal KC - 5/29 17:30:25
          Glad you've taken the wait and see route. You've looked like - TigerMatt STL - 5/29 17:30:19
     I really don't understand his ability to not make a decision - Sal KC - 5/29 17:17:06
          not only is that a logical conclusion, - gmmm98 MU - 5/29 17:36:14
          And as Rudy said, THAT WAS a decision (nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 5/29 17:28:05




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard