 |
|
You know damn well what I stated. Hall had/has great
Posted on: March 21, 2019 at 12:52:50 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
57224
Member For:
23.16 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
potential; produced at a high level when he was on the field - the problem for Mizzou was that he wasn't on the field enough; that's also going to cost him a lot of money in the draft (he'll have to disprove that label.)
Mizzou was 7-1 in games that Hall played in last season - the lone loss was okie lite, if Hall had been a full participant in that game, Mizzou would have won easily.
This was a thread about Mizzou's receiving corp - Hall was the strength last year and he missed too much. There was no experience at receiver behind him (JJ dropped more than he caught.) That was Odom's fault - not Halls. Even had Hall been 100% for the entire season, Odom should have ensured that Drew Lock had quality receivers for his career.
I like the freshmen that will return; Nance will be a great addition as well. Perhaps none will match Hall's ceiling, but there should be more overall quality at the position next year.
Mizzou was 7-1 in games that Hall played in last season - the lone loss was okie lite, if Hall had been a full participant in that game, Mizzou would have won easily.
This was a thread about Mizzou's receiving corp - Hall was the strength last year and he missed too much. There was no experience at receiver behind him (JJ dropped more than he caught.) That was Odom's fault - not Halls. Even had Hall been 100% for the entire season, Odom should have ensured that Drew Lock had quality receivers for his career.
I like the freshmen that will return; Nance will be a great addition as well. Perhaps none will match Hall's ceiling, but there should be more overall quality at the position next year.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
- 
You know damn well what I stated. Hall had/has great - tigerdb MU - 3/21 12:52:50