 |
|
Day 640 of the Mueller Probe - Where do Things Stand?
Posted on: February 17, 2019 at 10:13:27 CT
kp83 MU
Posts:
5221
Member For:
26.39 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It has now been 641 days since Mueller was named special counsel on May 17, 2017. So, where do things stand?
1. The DNC server (centerpiece of the Russian hacking narrative) still not forensically examined by the FBI.
2. No indictments of anyone on anything related to Trump campaign collusion with the Russians on election.
3. Strong evidence of collusion with Russian oligarch Deripaska during the campaign - collusion between him and Steele, with Steele paid by Fusion GPS, Fusion GPS paid by Hillary and DNC, with DOJ-FBI in the mix as well.
4. Did Stefan Halper just happen to be personally involved in the events that triggered the investigation of Flynn, Page and Papadopoulos? Did all three just happen to be contacted by Halper? Did Halper just happen to be a Clinton associate? Did Halper just happen to be paid $477K by the Obama Administration? Set-up!
5. Strong evidence the meeting at Trump Tower was also a set-up.
6. Increasing evidence the DOJ-FBI, weaponized by the Obama regime, used falsified evidence to fraudulently obtain a FISA warrant to spy on the political opposition. Regarding the key underpinning to the FSA warrant, Steele has admitted in court proceedings, “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.” (This bit of hypocrisy was at a time when Hillary was lambasting Trump over suspicions he might not accept the results of the election as the will of the American electorate.)
7. Increasing evidence that #6 is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to illegal use of tools for surveillance of foreign terrorist threats to spy on American citizens. (Refer to FISA Judge Collyer report of April 2017 that has been ignored by the corrupt mainstream media.)
8. Increasing evidence the Mueller investigation is not really about Trump-Russian collusion (which the SC team undoubtedly had to quickly figure out was a fabrication, if it was not known by them at the outset), but rather has an objective of covering up all manner of FBI-DOJ malfeasance and even criminal behavior, including their white-wash of massive wrong-doing by Hillary. (Perhaps the best example – FBI not investigating the fact that Chinese intelligence was getting every one of Hillary’s emails off her criminally deficient home-brew server.)
Is that about it? President Trump describes the Mueller Probe as a hoax. It increasingly looks like that is a very accurate description. I don’t see how an informed and intellectually honest observer (one able to put away their “Orange Man Bad” emotions) could see it any other way.
1. The DNC server (centerpiece of the Russian hacking narrative) still not forensically examined by the FBI.
2. No indictments of anyone on anything related to Trump campaign collusion with the Russians on election.
3. Strong evidence of collusion with Russian oligarch Deripaska during the campaign - collusion between him and Steele, with Steele paid by Fusion GPS, Fusion GPS paid by Hillary and DNC, with DOJ-FBI in the mix as well.
4. Did Stefan Halper just happen to be personally involved in the events that triggered the investigation of Flynn, Page and Papadopoulos? Did all three just happen to be contacted by Halper? Did Halper just happen to be a Clinton associate? Did Halper just happen to be paid $477K by the Obama Administration? Set-up!
5. Strong evidence the meeting at Trump Tower was also a set-up.
6. Increasing evidence the DOJ-FBI, weaponized by the Obama regime, used falsified evidence to fraudulently obtain a FISA warrant to spy on the political opposition. Regarding the key underpinning to the FSA warrant, Steele has admitted in court proceedings, “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.” (This bit of hypocrisy was at a time when Hillary was lambasting Trump over suspicions he might not accept the results of the election as the will of the American electorate.)
7. Increasing evidence that #6 is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to illegal use of tools for surveillance of foreign terrorist threats to spy on American citizens. (Refer to FISA Judge Collyer report of April 2017 that has been ignored by the corrupt mainstream media.)
8. Increasing evidence the Mueller investigation is not really about Trump-Russian collusion (which the SC team undoubtedly had to quickly figure out was a fabrication, if it was not known by them at the outset), but rather has an objective of covering up all manner of FBI-DOJ malfeasance and even criminal behavior, including their white-wash of massive wrong-doing by Hillary. (Perhaps the best example – FBI not investigating the fact that Chinese intelligence was getting every one of Hillary’s emails off her criminally deficient home-brew server.)
Is that about it? President Trump describes the Mueller Probe as a hoax. It increasingly looks like that is a very accurate description. I don’t see how an informed and intellectually honest observer (one able to put away their “Orange Man Bad” emotions) could see it any other way.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Day 640 of the Mueller Probe - Where do Things Stand? - kp83 MU - 2/17 10:13:27