Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Dem President declares a national emergency about

Posted on: February 15, 2019 at 13:47:45 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64229
Member For:
17.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
climate change. Takes a bunch of actions you don't like.

Dem's response:

"32 emergencies still in effect"

Your response to that? "Ok, that's cool"?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

31 national emergencies still in effect.... - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:33:35
     Dem President declares a national emergency about - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 13:47:45
          I imagine if the actions are beyond the scope - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 13:53:03
     Irrelevant... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 13:42:26
          It's not irrelevant at all - Sal KC - 2/15 13:57:57
               LAUGH - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:06:01
                    No I didn't - Sal KC - 2/15 14:07:09
          I'm trying to understand your point here. Are you against - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:55:20
          It's irrelevant if Congress opposes them - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 13:54:43
          Have you seen the list? - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/15 13:43:42
               Yes - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 13:53:41
                    Pretty much all of them - Sal KC - 2/15 14:00:07
                         I'll take just one - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:03:16
                              The entire point is there was no outrage - Sal KC - 2/15 14:04:52
                                   Yes...that's the entire point - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:10:01
                                        The very nature of declaring "national emergency" is - Sal KC - 2/15 14:14:18
                                             Yes, I know - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:30:08
     Similar to citing an activist appellate decision as - ummmm MU - 2/15 13:39:11
     Irrelevant (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:34:07
          lol (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/15 13:36:17
               They don’t magically turn constitutional with the 32nd - pickle MU - 2/15 13:37:46
                    I don't recall anyone discussing the 31. nm. - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:41:01
                         I think this one has been discussed on here: - ummmm MU - 2/15 13:44:33
                              RE: I think this one has been discussed on here: - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:48:53
                    That's not the point of the OP (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/15 13:40:47




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard