Welcome Guest

I think this one has been discussed on here:

Posted on: February 15, 2019 at 13:44:33 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Sept 12, 2018: The National Emergency With Respect to Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election attempted to prevent any meddling with the 2018 midterm elections amid the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Dem President declares a national emergency about - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 13:47:45
          I imagine if the actions are beyond the scope - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 13:53:03
     Irrelevant... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 13:42:26
          It's not irrelevant at all - Sal KC - 2/15 13:57:57
               LAUGH - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:06:01
                    No I didn't - Sal KC - 2/15 14:07:09
          I'm trying to understand your point here. Are you against - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:55:20
          It's irrelevant if Congress opposes them - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 13:54:43
          Have you seen the list? - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/15 13:43:42
               Yes - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 13:53:41
                    Pretty much all of them - Sal KC - 2/15 14:00:07
                         I'll take just one - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:03:16
                              The entire point is there was no outrage - Sal KC - 2/15 14:04:52
                                   Yes...that's the entire point - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:10:01
                                        The very nature of declaring "national emergency" is - Sal KC - 2/15 14:14:18
                                             Yes, I know - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/15 14:30:08
     Similar to citing an activist appellate decision as - ummmm MU - 2/15 13:39:11
     Irrelevant (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:34:07
          lol (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/15 13:36:17
               They don’t magically turn constitutional with the 32nd - pickle MU - 2/15 13:37:46
                    I don't recall anyone discussing the 31. nm. - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:41:01
                         I think this one has been discussed on here: - ummmm MU - 2/15 13:44:33
                              RE: I think this one has been discussed on here: - MUTGR MU - 2/15 13:48:53
                    That's not the point of the OP (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/15 13:40:47




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard