Welcome Guest

TheShoe has his "facts" wrong though

Posted on: January 25, 2019 at 10:16:10 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

229171

Member For:

21.98 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Stone was not charged for conspiracy relating to Wikileaks, so it doesn't really matter who the senior official was. TheShoe stated a senior official directed Stone to commit the crimes he was indicted for which is false.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

lol BOMBSHELL FRIDAY!! Finally Russian collusion?!!!?? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:13:45

Your whines about no collusion have been heard on high - raskolnikov MU - 1/25 08:29:29

You clearly didn't read about the Stone "deal" (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 08:34:23

Obstruction, lying and witness tampering - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:33:35

This depends on what he is lying about, doesn't it? - raskolnikov MU - 1/25 08:39:54

You already calling a Trump defeat again? Lol(nm) - TheWildcat STL - 1/25 08:30:12

Well you see, one can pretty much bank on a one-off being - raskolnikov MU - 1/25 08:55:02

So who is the "senior campaign official" - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:21:23

What? (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 08:32:38

Bannon, and what the hell is "directed to commit conspiracy" - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:22:31

The indictment clearly states stone was directed - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:37:36

lol what? Stone wasn't indicted for reaching out to wikileak - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:45:18

He's referring to this: - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/25 09:34:38

TheShoe has his "facts" wrong though - Sal KC - 1/25 10:16:10

in relation to what? - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:50:59

lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:57:10

If they had more than perjury it would be in the indictment - Sal KC - 1/25 08:53:43

The Shoe is pulling a rask here - Sal KC - 1/25 08:45:48

if anti-Drumpfers would just read the actual indictments - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:49:10

You can't read very well - Sal KC - 1/25 08:40:28

Which is why he wasn't indicted by a federal grand jury - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:42:28

Lol the indictment didn't charge Stone - Sal KC - 1/25 08:44:34

Yeah Donnie has never directed anyone to break the law - MrBlueSky MU - 1/25 08:31:16

You can't keep on track (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 08:33:44

ok?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:32:56

"Did Donald Trump push a campaign staff member to - MrBlueSky MU - 1/25 08:21:21

What is wrong with contacting Wikileaks? - Sal KC - 1/25 08:33:10

According to Mueller, nothing(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:35:07

It shouldn't take Mueller to clarify - Sal KC - 1/25 08:35:54

Russian Collusion/Conspiracy charges filed=Zero - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:23:20

Why oh why was Stone contacting Wikileaks - MrBlueSky MU - 1/25 08:29:29

According to the indictment, it was to get opposition dirt - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/25 08:32:40

But RRRUSSSSSIIIIIAAAAAAA! (nm) - TheWildcat STL - 1/25 08:33:00

Wikileaks is not Russia.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/25 08:32:02