Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Well you see, one can pretty much bank on a one-off being

Posted on: January 25, 2019 at 08:55:02 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
in fact a one-off, an outlier, a result not to be seen again. 70,000 votes in three states, not likely.

Oh and you have a guy asking for a job coming in at 47% approval. THEN when the people actually see him doing the job and he loses 20% of the approval dropping him into the high 30s. Much depends on the opposition, but donnie is starting in a pretty big hole - OH and how DID that promise for that Mexico-funded wall work out?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

lol BOMBSHELL FRIDAY!! Finally Russian collusion?!!!?? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:13:45
     Your whines about no collusion have been heard on high - raskolnikov MU - 1/25 08:29:29
          You clearly didn't read about the Stone "deal" (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 08:34:23
          Obstruction, lying and witness tampering - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:33:35
               This depends on what he is lying about, doesn't it? - raskolnikov MU - 1/25 08:39:54
          You already calling a Trump defeat again? Lol(nm) - TheWildcat STL - 1/25 08:30:12
               Well you see, one can pretty much bank on a one-off being - raskolnikov MU - 1/25 08:55:02
     So who is the "senior campaign official" - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:21:23
          What? (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 08:32:38
          Bannon, and what the hell is "directed to commit conspiracy" - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:22:31
               The indictment clearly states stone was directed - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:37:36
                    lol what? Stone wasn't indicted for reaching out to wikileak - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:45:18
                         He's referring to this: - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/25 09:34:38
                              TheShoe has his "facts" wrong though - Sal KC - 1/25 10:16:10
                         in relation to what? - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:50:59
                              lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:57:10
                              If they had more than perjury it would be in the indictment - Sal KC - 1/25 08:53:43
                         The Shoe is pulling a rask here - Sal KC - 1/25 08:45:48
                              if anti-Drumpfers would just read the actual indictments - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:49:10
                    You can't read very well - Sal KC - 1/25 08:40:28
                         Which is why he wasn't indicted by a federal grand jury - TheShoe STL - 1/25 08:42:28
                              Lol the indictment didn't charge Stone - Sal KC - 1/25 08:44:34
               Yeah Donnie has never directed anyone to break the law - MrBlueSky MU - 1/25 08:31:16
                    You can't keep on track (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 08:33:44
                    ok?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:32:56
     "Did Donald Trump push a campaign staff member to - MrBlueSky MU - 1/25 08:21:21
          What is wrong with contacting Wikileaks? - Sal KC - 1/25 08:33:10
               According to Mueller, nothing(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:35:07
                    It shouldn't take Mueller to clarify - Sal KC - 1/25 08:35:54
          Russian Collusion/Conspiracy charges filed=Zero - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:23:20
               Why oh why was Stone contacting Wikileaks - MrBlueSky MU - 1/25 08:29:29
                    According to the indictment, it was to get opposition dirt - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 08:32:40
                         But RRRUSSSSSIIIIIAAAAAAA! (nm) - TheWildcat STL - 1/25 08:33:00
                    Wikileaks is not Russia.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/25 08:32:02




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard