Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You aren’t willfully ignorant because you disagree with them

Posted on: January 23, 2019 at 12:54:01 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
265841
Member For:
25.80 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
you’re willfully ignorant because you have a closed mind and you resist any new and challenging idea; you stick with your prejudices and preconceived notions. You are willfully ignorant because you choose not to be informed.

You aren’t interested in debate, discussion, or learning. You are immature and that is your problem. This is one reason for your straw man arguments

Edited by pickle at 12:57:14 on 01/23/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Where we are re debate on this board and in this country. I - hokie VT - 1/23 12:51:17
     Calling you a stupid mother****er implies nothing about - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/23 13:54:20
          No kidding. Thanx tiger jackoff. nm - hokie VT - 1/23 14:14:04
     hokie has been awarded the official Emoji Man 👍🏾. All you - Emoji Man MSU - 1/23 13:32:35
          I'm not sure what all this means, but Brookings - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 1/23 13:37:50
               Brookings is willfully ignorant and unwilling to learn. nm - hokie VT - 1/23 13:49:13
          I would like to thank my mother who is not stupid, and all - hokie VT - 1/23 13:36:53
               Did you grow up in an older house with lead paint?(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:56:57
                    Yes. Paint chips were a tasty treat when we were good. nm, - hokie VT - 1/23 14:04:05
                    Not everyone can grow up burning tires down by the - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 1/23 13:59:07
     You categorize people based off one genetic aspect, skin - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 12:58:23
          We disagree. nm - hokie VT - 1/23 13:02:14
               on what? why is skin color the de facto characteristic - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 13:15:00
                    You're not going to answer my question about the nobel - hokie VT - 1/23 13:17:35
                         Lol your calling people cowardly - pickle MU - 1/23 13:33:36
                         I answered it. Who is the Nobel Winner? can I have - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 13:21:23
                              YOU WILL DECIDE if the nobel prize winner in genetics is - hokie VT - 1/23 13:28:31
                                   You are using an appeal to authority fallacy by dismissing - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:42:56
                                        And he may not like the kansas city chiefs. What does that - hokie VT - 1/23 13:53:20
                                             Watson never wrote a paper on sub-Saharan Africans - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:56:03
                                   Holy **** (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 13:34:51
                                   Most biologists have dismissed Watson as willfully - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:29:26
                                        Most? You know that how? You take a poll? You know all - hokie VT - 1/23 13:31:03
                                             Oh boy. Yes because race does not exist genetically. So - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:40:03
                                                  Your attempt at logic diminishes you. Since YOU have - hokie VT - 1/23 13:43:42
                                                       No. Biologists all over have rejected Watson. JFC you - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:53:20
                                                            I am dumb. I need more than your statement to convince - hokie VT - 1/23 13:56:36
                                                                 Google is your friend. Watson never performed a study. He - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 14:00:24
                                                                      Is google your enemy? You made the claim, support it. nm - hokie VT - 1/23 14:11:31
                                                                           Waiting on Watson's research paper. Can't find it.(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 14:12:15
                         Who is this Nobel Prize winner?(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:18:05
                              Watson i think. Discovered DNA. Pretty dumb guy. And - hokie VT - 1/23 13:24:22
                                   Johann Friedrich Miescher discovered DNA, not Watson. - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:32:39
               Then what is race? What is the scientific basis - pickle MU - 1/23 13:03:08
     You don't even understand what people say about you. - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 12:57:44
          Would you say the same thing to the nobel prize winner with - hokie VT - 1/23 13:05:04
               Who is this Nobel Prize winner?(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 13:21:41
               1. if he was willfully ignorant, yes, or lacked the - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 13:16:12
                    Pretty lame 90. Pretty cowardly. Can't answer? nm - hokie VT - 1/23 13:18:15
                         you’re proving his point again (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 13:32:39
               lol here you are proving his point (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 13:05:50
     also, i said you are one ignorant mother****er (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 12:56:15
          well he is stupid as well - JG MU - 1/23 12:58:23
               agree 100% (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 12:58:49
          i caught that too; he misplaced a properly placed modifier - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 12:58:12
     You aren’t willfully ignorant because you disagree with them - pickle MU - 1/23 12:54:01
          Wrong spot (nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/23 12:57:44
               twss (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 13:38:54




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard