Where we are re debate on this board and in this country. I

Posted on: January 23, 2019 at 12:51:17 CT

disagree with 90 (whom i respect) matt (who occasionally makesraational arguments) and the pickle (who is an idiot).

I have posted to each, save the pickle, "we disagree."

Not agreeing with them makes me "willfully ignorant" and i "ignore the facts". I am of course stupid, that goes without saying or as the pickle so eloquently put it, i am a stupid mother****er.

My mother is not stupid, for the record.

Someone said that in the old days, people who disagreed, just disagreed. The other side was wrong, according to each. Fine.

Today, the other side is not only wrong, they are evil. And stupid.

I am not smart like those other guys, again save the pickle, but my position is the same as many many scientists including i think the noble prize winner in genetics. But according to 90 they too are willfully ignorant. According to matt they are stupid and according to the always eloquent pickle they are stupid mother****ers.

I suppose that if all those scientists including the noble prize winner were confronted with the wisdom and logic of 90, matt and the pickle, they would give up their positions based on their life's work and rush to the side of 90, matt and the pickle.

We disagree. Is that forbidden now?

EDIT: and the pickle said that i'm not interested in learning. Because i was not persuaded by him calling me a stupid mother****er, i guess.

Edited by hokie at 12:54:05 on 01/23/19