Welcome Guest

Not trying to pick a fight, Matt, but did you notice

Posted on: January 23, 2019 at 09:00:46 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68168
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
that the article essentially used what it considers science, to combat what it considers to be a racism? The article is in my opinion, political correctness and political science, disguised as a scientific fact.

That is what the fantasy of, race as a social construct is, in my opinion. By saying race is a social construct and not a biological factor, liberals and silly people can deny the obvious and pretend it is science.

Did you notice in the article you linked, that’s the author initially talked about “… Biological and social sciences...” and later in the piece says that even if scientists agree… So she cleverly acknowledged that the social construct fantasy is from social scientists, and then did away with the preface of being social.

Furthermore, in this linked article, humans and frogs are very very similar genetically. But there are differences. On the grand scale of DNA, the differences are fairly minor. Yet I don’t think anyone, outside of the pickle and his idiot infantry, would suggest that there are only minor differences between humans and frogs. I’m talking about amphibians, not French people.

So the minute differences that the author acknowledges between the races, can within the construct of a human being, account for significant differences in intelligence and other human traits.

The author also talks about how awful the alt right is and how the link of skull size to intelligence is void. She says their claims of a larger skull size connecting to larger and more intelligent brains has not been proved.

She does not say it has been disapproved.

And I think I am aware of other studies that link brain size and skull size. Not sure about that.

With mounting evidence on the genetic differences between the races, the left has been clinging to a fantasy that denies reality. That there are no races. Therefore everyone is equal. Therefore whites can run as fast and jump as high as blacks. If you think differently, you are a science denier. Or at least a social science denier.

The idiot infantry on this board has also said that sex is a social construct. That is another story altogether of course, but it is in my opinion, another attempt by the left to deny reality. In the name of equality.

So it’s OK, it is wholesome and wonderful. But it’s false.

https://www.livescience.com/6379-frogs-surprisingly-humans-genetically-speaking.html
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Correct: race does not exist (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 08:43:34
          In humans(nm) - JG MU - 1/23 11:52:56
               🤨 (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 1/23 13:26:44
          Racial divisions are a product of collectivism.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 09:19:53
     Science is not PC. The truth is racist. Except for the - hokie VT - 1/23 08:03:38
          Race is a social construct. Consider 3 human genome - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 08:28:43
               not really - Spanky KU - 1/23 09:23:12
                    Except that is wrong. - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 09:46:51
                         What a nice PC response by the government (circa 1992) - Spanky KU - 1/23 10:04:57
                              Michigan State Dept. Of Anthropology, not gov't. You should - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 10:16:19
               Not trying to pick a fight, Matt, but did you notice - hokie VT - 1/23 09:00:46
                    “the social construct fantasy” - pickle MU - 1/23 09:39:09
                    Science shows that genetic races do not exist. That is why - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 09:18:20
                    RE: Not trying to pick a fight, Matt, but did you notice - meatiger MU - 1/23 09:11:04
                         You are such an ass. I have answered that question. Multiple - hokie VT - 1/23 09:15:19
                              RE: You are such an ass. I have answered that question. Multiple - meatiger MU - 1/23 09:19:13
                                   That is not an answer? Why not? And I appreciate - hokie VT - 1/23 09:24:04
                                        RE: That is not an answer? Why not? And I appreciate - meatiger MU - 1/23 09:36:18
                                             Did i ask or beg for a plan? nm - hokie VT - 1/23 10:41:24
                                             You can’t imagine... So in every discussion you’ve ever had - hokie VT - 1/23 09:57:50
               I'm not arguing here, but I do have a question. When you/th - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 08:48:39
                    Genetically speaking the divisions of race are arbitrary. - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 09:17:16
                         I get that, but you didn't answer my question (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 09:23:53
                              The whole point is there is nothing in genetics to divide - TigerMatt STL - 1/23 09:35:25
                                   depends on if you use the term "race" to describe a - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 09:55:34
                    RE: I'm not arguing here, but I do have a question. When you/th - meatiger MU - 1/23 09:01:54
                         let me know if you decide to address my question (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/23 09:24:18
     Would you print the article. Would like to read.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/23 07:58:05
          RE: Would you print the article. Would like to read.(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 08:20:33
               Thanks. Good article. I have a feeling that - GA Tiger MU - 1/23 09:32:22
     I hope you don’t pay to see their articles(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 1/23 06:00:23




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard